Cited by 73SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchT-cell and B-cell Immunologyvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

A comparative characterization of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells induced by mRNA or inactive virus COVID-19 vaccines

Open access
Lim, Joey Ming Er, Hang, Shou Kit, Hariharaputran, Smrithi, Chia, Adeline, Tan, Nicole, Lee, Eng Sing, Chng, Edwin, Lim, Poh Lian +5 more·2022·Cell Reports Medicine

Abstract

Unlike mRNA vaccines based only on the spike protein, inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines should induce a diversified T cell response recognizing distinct structural proteins. Here, we perform a comparative analysis of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells in healthy individuals following vaccination with inactivated SARS-CoV-2 or mRNA vaccines. Relative to spike mRNA vaccination, inactivated vaccines elicit a lower magnitude of spike-specific T cells, but the combination of membrane, nucleoprotein, and spike-specific T cell response is quantitatively comparable with the sole spike T cell response induced by mRNA vaccine, and they efficiently tolerate the mutations characterizing the Omicron lineage. However, this multi-protein-specific T cell response is not mediated by a coordinated CD4 and CD8 T cell expansion but by selective priming of CD4 T cells. These findings can help in understanding the role of CD4 and CD8 T cells in the efficacy of the different vaccines to control severe COVID-19 after Omicron infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100793

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 73

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [6]Jeewandara C. Aberathna I.S. Pushpakumara P.D. Kamaladasa A. Guruge D. Wijesinghe A. Gunasekera B. Ramu S.T. Kuruppu H. Ranasinghe T. Persistence of immune responses to the Sinopharm/BBIBP-CorV vaccine Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 10 2021 10.1101/2021.10.14.21265030 2021.10.14.21265030 PMC9091995 35634958 · DOI

Authors
Lim, J. M. E., Hang, S. K., Hariharaputran, S., Chia, A., Tan, N., Lee, E. S., Chng, E., Lim, P. L., Young, B. E., Lye, D. C., Le Bert, N., Bertoletti, A., & Tan, A. T.
Affiliations
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
  • NHG Polyclinics (SG)
  • Tan Tock Seng Hospital (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
Corresponding author
  • Bertoletti, Antonio
  • Tan, Anthony T.
Venue
Cell Reports Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
3
Issue
11
Pages
100793
ISSN
2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4302287373
Cited by
73
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 2
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health -Singapore
  • National Medical Research Council (COVID19RF-008, COVID19RF-001, COVID19RF3-0060)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 vaccines, inactivated vaccine, mRNA vaccines, T cell response, spike protein, membrane proteins, nucleocapsid protein, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, T cell priming, vaccine comparison
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, Humans, RNA, Messenger, Viral Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review