Safety and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 self-amplifying RNA vaccine expressing an anchored RBD: A randomized, observer-blind phase 1 study
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Summary BACKGROUND VLPCOV-01 is a lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccine that expresses a membrane-anchored receptor-binding domain (RBD) derived from the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. METHODS A phase 1 study of VLPCOV-01 was conducted at Medical Corporation Heishinkai OPHAC Hospital, Japan. Participants aged 18 to 55 or ≥65 years who had completed two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine 6 to 12 months previously were randomised to receive one intramuscular vaccination of 0·3, 1·0, or 3·0 μg VLPCOV-01, 30 μg BNT162b2, or placebo between February 16, 2022, and March 17, 2022. Solicited adverse events were collected up to 6 days post-administration. Interim immunogenicity analyses included SARS-CoV-2 IgG and neutralising antibody titres. Follow-up for safety and immunogenicity evaluation is ongoing. (The trial is registered: jRCT2051210164). FINDINGS 92 healthy adults were enrolled, with 60 participants receiving VLPCOV-01. No serious adverse events were reported up to 26 weeks, and no prespecified trial-halting events were met. VLPCOV-01 induced robust IgG titres against SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein that were maintained up to 26 weeks in non-elderly participants, with geometric means ranging from 5037 (95% CI 1272–19,940) at 0·3 μg to 12,873 (95% CI 937–17,686) at 3 μg, in comparison to 3166 (95% CI 1619–6191) with 30 μg BNT162b2. Among elderly participants, IgG titres at 26 weeks post-vaccination with 3 μg VLPCOV-01 were 9865 (95% CI 4396–22138) compared to 4183 (95% CI 1436–12180) following vaccination with 30 μg BNT162b2. Pseudovirus neutralising antibody responses were observed against multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants and strongly correlated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ( r =0·950, p<0·001). INTERPRETATION VLPCOV-01 is immunogenic following low dose administration, with anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses comparable to BNT162b2. These findings support further development of VLPCOV-01 as a COVID-19 booster vaccine and the potential for saRNA vectors as a vaccine platform. FUNDING Supported by AMED, Grant No. JP21nf0101627.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent clinical trial results revealed comparable immunogenicity of a saRNA vaccine at one-tenth of the dose of an equivalent mRNA vaccine, but side effects were similar between treatment groups.
“Recent clinical trial results revealed comparable immunogenicity of a saRNA vaccine at one-tenth of the dose of an equivalent mRNA vaccine. However, side effects were similar between the treatment groups12.”
From Complete substitution with modified nucleotides in self-amplifying RNA suppresses the interferon response and increases potency (2025) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 41
- Authors
- Akahata, W., Sekida, T., Nogimori, T., Ode, H., Tamura, T., Kono, K., Kazami, Y., Washizaki, A., Masuta, Y., Suzuki, R., Matsuda, K., Komori, M., Morey, A. L., Ishimoto, K., Nakata, M., Hasunuma, T., Fukuhara, T., Iwatani, Y., Yamamoto, T., Smith, J. F., & Sato, N.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition (JP)
- National Hospital Organization (JP)
- Hokkaido University (JP)
- VLP Therapeutics (United States) (US)
- Kitasato Institute Hospital (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Akahata, Wataru
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell Reports Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 101134
- ISSN
- 2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10439244
- OpenAlex
- W4385841313
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 8.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (JP21nf0101627)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- self-amplifying RNA vaccine, SARS-CoV-2, spike protein receptor-binding domain, lipid nanoparticle vaccine, BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine, vaccine immunogenicity, neutralizing antibodies, SARS-CoV-2 variants, vaccine safety, COVID-19 vaccines
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, mRNA Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Humans, Middle Aged, RNA, Vaccines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review