Cited by 17DNA Repair MechanismsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerCancer therapeutics and mechanisms

Tolerance to colibactin correlates with homologous recombination proficiency and resistance to irinotecan in colorectal cancer cells

Open access
Sogari, Alberto, Rovera, Emanuele, Grasso, Gaia, Mariella, Elisa, Reilly, Nicole Megan, Lamba, Simona, Mauri, Gianluca, Durinikova, Erika +15 more·2024·Cell Reports Medicine

Abstract

The bacterial genotoxin colibactin promotes colorectal cancer (CRC) tumorigenesis, but systematic assessment of its impact on DNA repair is lacking, and its effect on response to DNA-damaging chemotherapeutics is unknown. We find that CRC cell lines display differential response to colibactin on the basis of homologous recombination (HR) proficiency. Sensitivity to colibactin is induced by inhibition of ATM, which regulates DNA double-strand break repair, and blunted by HR reconstitution. Conversely, CRC cells chronically infected with colibactin develop a tolerant phenotype characterized by restored HR activity. Notably, sensitivity to colibactin correlates with response to irinotecan active metabolite SN38, in both cell lines and patient-derived organoids. Moreover, CRC cells that acquire colibactin tolerance develop cross-resistance to SN38, and a trend toward poorer response to irinotecan is observed in a retrospective cohort of CRCs harboring colibactin genomic island. Our results shed insight into colibactin activity and provide translational evidence on its chemoresistance-promoting role in CRC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101376

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E. coli Nissle 1917 synthesizes and releases colibactin, a mutagenic substance that promotes colorectal polyposis and cancer and reduces cancer response to irinotecan.

    “having the capability of synthetizing and releasing colibactin, a mutagenic substance described to promote colorectal polyposis and cancer, and reducing cancer response to irinotecan [26, 34–39].”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction describes colibactin as a genotoxin associated with colorectal cancer and reports increased tumor formation in preclinical mouse models. The Results find that colibactin-tolerant colorectal cancer cells are also resistant to SN38, irinotecan’s active metabolite; the Discussion says clinical resistance remains to be established. These passages do not identify E. coli Nissle 1917 as the producer, establish that it releases colibactin, or show that colibactin itself reduces patients’ response to irinotecan. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • E. coli Nissle 1917 is pks-positive.

    “the most widely used E. coli-based probiotic, known as E. coli Nissle 1917 (DSM 6601), is pks-positive.”

    From Selection, Comparative Genomics, and Potential Probiotic Features of Escherichia coli 5C, a pks-Negative Strain Isolated from Healthy Infant Donor Feces (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction says that some E. coli strains harbor the pks island, but does not identify Nissle 1917 as one of them. The References list a paper about the genotoxic activity of Nissle 1917, while the Methods identify a different experimental strain, DH10B pBeloBAC-pks. Searches for Nissle 1917 and DSM 6601 found no passage in our copy stating that Nissle 1917 is pks-positive. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 17

Authors
Sogari, A., Rovera, E., Grasso, G., Mariella, E., Reilly, N. M., Lamba, S., Mauri, G., Durinikova, E., Vitiello, P. P., Lorenzato, A., Avolio, M., Piumatti, E., Bonoldi, E., Aquilano, M. C., Arena, S., Sartore-Bianchi, A., Siena, S., Trusolino, L., Donalisio, M., Russo, M., Di Nicolantonio, F., Lembo, D., & Bardelli, A.
Affiliations
  • IFOM (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
Corresponding author
Bardelli, Alberto
Venue
Cell Reports Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
101376
ISSN
2666-3791 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390877039
Cited by
17
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK (A28223, A26825, 27321, 22795)
  • European Commission (101058620, 754923, HORIZON2020, H2020)
  • Ministero della Salute ("5 x 1000"., 21091)
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (2022LSFKWE, H2020, 5x1000)
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (MFAG 2021 - ID 26439, IG-2018, 20236, MFAG 2021, 5X 1000, MFAG 2017, 22802, 21091, 21923, 22795)
  • Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (22795, 21923)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (754923, 101058620, 101020342)
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (754923)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Keywords
colibactin, colorectal cancer, homologous recombination, irinotecan, SN-38, chemoresistance, ATM, DNA double-strand break repair, bacterial genotoxins, patient-derived organoids, DNA repair
MeSH terms
Irinotecan, DNA, Escherichia coli, Humans, Peptides, Retrospective Studies, Colorectal Neoplasms, Polyketides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review