Contribution of periphytic biofilm of paddy soils to carbon dioxide fixation and methane emissions
Open accessAbstract
Rice paddies are major contributors to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions via methane (CH 4 ) flux. The accurate quantification of CH 4 emissions from rice paddies remains problematic, in part due to uncertainties and omissions in the contribution of microbial aggregates on the soil surface to carbon fluxes. Herein, we comprehensively evaluated the contribution of one form of microbial aggregates, periphytic biofilm (PB), to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and CH 4 emissions from paddies distributed across three climatic zones, and quantified the pathways that drive net CH 4 production as well as CO 2 fixation. We found that PB accounted for 7.1%–38.5% of CH 4 emissions and 7.2%–12.7% of CO 2 fixation in the rice paddies. During their growth phase, PB fixed CO 2 and increased the redox potential, which promoted aerobic CH 4 oxidation. During the decay phase, PB degradation reduced redox potential and increased soil organic carbon availability, which promoted methanogenic microbial community growth and metabolism and increased CH 4 emissions. Overall, PB acted as a biotic converter of atmospheric CO 2 to CH 4 , and aggravated carbon emissions by up to 2,318 kg CO 2 equiv ha −1 season −1 . Our results provide proof-of-concept evidence for the discrimination of the contributions of surface microbial aggregates (i.e., PB) from soil microbes, and a profound foundation for the estimation and simulation of carbon fluxes in a potential novel approach to the mitigation of CH 4 emissions by manipulating PB growth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For subface water ice, various drill-based excavation methods have been proposed.
“For the subface water ice, various drill-based excavation methods have been proposed. 94-99”
From Energy system and resource utilization in space: A state-of-the-art review (2024) · cites this paper as [96]
The Results section discusses redox potentials in flooded paddy soil, not water-ice excavation. Searches for drill-based excavation, drilling, and subsurface ice found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Wang, S., Sun, P., Zhang, G., Gray, N., Dolfing, J., Esquivel-Elizondo, S., Peñuelas, J., & Wu, Y.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Yonghong
- Venue
- The Innovation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100192
- ISSN
- 2666-6758 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8672048
- OpenAlex
- W3216613381
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Innovation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772396, 41825021, 41961144010)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-LY-DQC024)
- Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BE2020731, BZ2019015)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
- Keywords
- periphytic biofilms, paddy fields, methane emissions, CO2 fixation, greenhouse gas emissions, microbial aggregates, redox potential, aerobic methane oxidation, methanogenic microbial communities, soil organic carbon, climate zones, methane mitigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review