Cited by 74Intramuscular injections and effectsAdvancements in Transdermal Drug DeliveryIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety

Understanding Subcutaneous Tissue Pressure for Engineering Injection Devices for Large-Volume Protein Delivery

Doughty, Diane V., Clawson, Corbin Z., Lambert, William, Subramony, J. Anand·2016·Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

Subcutaneous injection allows for self-administration of monoclonal antibodies using prefilled syringes, autoinjectors, and on-body injector devices. However, subcutaneous injections are typically limited to 1 mL due to concerns of injection pain from volume, viscosity, and formulation characteristics. Back pressure can serve as an indicator for changes in subcutaneous mechanical properties leading to pain during injection. The purpose of this study was to investigate subcutaneous pressures and injection site reactions as a function of injection volume and flow rate. A pressure sensor in the fluid path recorded subcutaneous pressures in the abdomen of Yorkshire swine. The subcutaneous tissue accommodates large-volume injections and with little back pressure as long as low flow rates are used. A 1 mL injection in 10 seconds (360 mL/h flow rate) generated a pressure of 24.0 ± 3.4 kPa, whereas 10 mL delivered in 10 minutes (60 mL/h flow rate) generated a pressure of 7.4 ± 7.8 kPa. After the injection, the pressure decays to 0 over several seconds. The subcutaneous pressures and mechanical strain increased with increasing flow rate but not increasing dose volume. These data are useful for the design of injection devices to mitigate back pressure and pain during subcutaneous large-volume injection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.04.009

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Significant research is being conducted with a focus on further facilitating subcutaneous injections, such as enhancements in infusion-rate-dependent tolerability, improvements in infusion pump technology, and novel drug-delivery devices.

    “Inspired by the benefits of subcutaneous dosing to patients and the overall healthcare system, significant research is being conducted with a focus on further facilitating subcutaneous injections, such as enhancements in infusion-rate-dependent tolerability, improvements in infusion pump technology, and novel drug-delivery devices [67–69].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 74

Authors
Doughty, D. V., Clawson, C. Z., Lambert, W., & Subramony, J. A.
Corresponding author
Doughty, Diane V.
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
105
Issue
7
Pages
2105-2113
ISSN
0022-3549 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2416693699
Cited by
74
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Keywords
back pressure, large volume injection, injection pain, flow rate, injection volume, injection site reactions, prefilled syringes, autoinjector
MeSH terms
Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Edema, Equipment Design, Erythema, Injections, Subcutaneous, Pain, Pressure, Proteins, Swine, Syringes, Drug Delivery Systems, Subcutaneous Tissue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review