Cited by 73Plant tissue culture and regenerationCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

Highly efficient and genotype-independent barley gene editing based on anther culture

Open access
Han, Yong, Broughton, Sue, Liu, Li, Zhang, Xiao-Qi, Zeng, Jianbin, He, Xiaoyan, Li, Chengdao·2021·Plant Communications

Abstract

Recalcitrance to tissue culture and genetic transformation is the major bottleneck for gene manipulation in crops. In barley, immature embryos of Golden Promise have typically been used as explants for transformation. However, the genotype dependence of this approach limits the genetic modification of commercial varieties. Here, we developed an anther culture-based system that permits the effective creation of transgenic and gene-edited plants from commercial barley varieties. The protocol was tested in Golden Promise and four Australian varieties, which differed in phenology, callus induction, and green plant regeneration responses. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed on microspore-derived callus to target the HvPDS gene, and T0 albinos with targeted mutations were successfully obtained from commercial varieties. Further editing of three targets was achieved with an average mutation rate of 53% in the five varieties. In 51 analyzed T0 individuals, Cas9 induced a large proportion (69%) of single-base indels and two-base deletions in the target sites, with variable mutation rates among targets and varieties. Both on-target and off-target activities were detected in T1 progenies. Compared with immature embryo protocols, this genotype-independent platform can deliver a high editing efficiency and more regenerant plants within a similar time frame. It shows promise for functional genomics and the application of CRISPR technologies for the precise improvement of commercial varieties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100082

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gene editing in barley is performed mainly by delivering the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing complex through particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

    “Gene editing in barley is performed mainly by delivering the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing complex through particle bombardment or Agrobacteriummediated transformation (Han et al., 2021).”
  • Enzymes that can digest the wild-type DNA, but not the mutant DNA, can be used to pinpoint mutations as heterozygous or homozygous on agarose gels.

    “Enzymes that can digest the wild-type DNA, but not the mutant DNA, can be used to pinpoint mutations as heterozygous or homozygous on agarose gels (Han et al., 2021;Karunarathne et al., 2022).”
  • Other cultivars such as 'Compass', 'Spartacus', and the breeding line WI4330 have been used in previous research, but with low efficiency.

    “Other cultivars such as 'Compass', 'Spartacus', and the breeding line WI4330 have been used in previous research, but with low efficiency (Ismagul et al., 2014;Han et al., 2021;Karunarathne et al., 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 73

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Touraev A. Forster B.P. Jain S.M. Advances in Haploid Production in Higher Plants 2009 Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht

Authors
Han, Y., Broughton, S., Liu, L., Zhang, X.-Q., Zeng, J., He, X., & Li, C.
Affiliations
  • Murdoch University (AU)
  • Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU)
  • Qingdao Agricultural University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Chengdao
Venue
Plant Communications
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
100082
ISSN
2590-3462 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033394385
Cited by
73
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Funders
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
barley, anther culture, genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, transgenic plants, Golden Promise, genotype-independent transformation, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, mutation rate, off-target effects, plant regeneration
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Hordeum, Cells, Cultured, Genotype, Flowers, Plant Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review