Highly efficient and genotype-independent barley gene editing based on anther culture
Open accessAbstract
Recalcitrance to tissue culture and genetic transformation is the major bottleneck for gene manipulation in crops. In barley, immature embryos of Golden Promise have typically been used as explants for transformation. However, the genotype dependence of this approach limits the genetic modification of commercial varieties. Here, we developed an anther culture-based system that permits the effective creation of transgenic and gene-edited plants from commercial barley varieties. The protocol was tested in Golden Promise and four Australian varieties, which differed in phenology, callus induction, and green plant regeneration responses. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was performed on microspore-derived callus to target the HvPDS gene, and T0 albinos with targeted mutations were successfully obtained from commercial varieties. Further editing of three targets was achieved with an average mutation rate of 53% in the five varieties. In 51 analyzed T0 individuals, Cas9 induced a large proportion (69%) of single-base indels and two-base deletions in the target sites, with variable mutation rates among targets and varieties. Both on-target and off-target activities were detected in T1 progenies. Compared with immature embryo protocols, this genotype-independent platform can deliver a high editing efficiency and more regenerant plants within a similar time frame. It shows promise for functional genomics and the application of CRISPR technologies for the precise improvement of commercial varieties.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gene editing in barley is performed mainly by delivering the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing complex through particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
“Gene editing in barley is performed mainly by delivering the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing complex through particle bombardment or Agrobacteriummediated transformation (Han et al., 2021).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2021
Enzymes that can digest the wild-type DNA, but not the mutant DNA, can be used to pinpoint mutations as heterozygous or homozygous on agarose gels.
“Enzymes that can digest the wild-type DNA, but not the mutant DNA, can be used to pinpoint mutations as heterozygous or homozygous on agarose gels (Han et al., 2021;Karunarathne et al., 2022).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2021
Other cultivars such as 'Compass', 'Spartacus', and the breeding line WI4330 have been used in previous research, but with low efficiency.
“Other cultivars such as 'Compass', 'Spartacus', and the breeding line WI4330 have been used in previous research, but with low efficiency (Ismagul et al., 2014;Han et al., 2021;Karunarathne et al., 2022).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Han et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 80 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Touraev A. Forster B.P. Jain S.M. Advances in Haploid Production in Higher Plants 2009 Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht
- Authors
- Han, Y., Broughton, S., Liu, L., Zhang, X.-Q., Zeng, J., He, X., & Li, C.
- Affiliations
- Murdoch University (AU)
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU)
- Qingdao Agricultural University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Chengdao
- Venue
- Plant Communications
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100082
- ISSN
- 2590-3462 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8060703
- OpenAlex
- W3033394385
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 80
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plant Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Government of Western Australia
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Keywords
- barley, anther culture, genome editing, CRISPR/Cas9, transgenic plants, Golden Promise, genotype-independent transformation, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, mutation rate, off-target effects, plant regeneration
- MeSH terms
- Gene Editing, Hordeum, Cells, Cultured, Genotype, Flowers, Plant Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review