Cited by 41Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGene Regulatory Network AnalysisHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

Computational analysis of EGFR inhibition by Argos

Open access
Reeves, Gregory T., Kalifa, Rachel, Klein, Daryl E., Lemmon, Mark A., Shvartsman, Stanislav Y.·2005·Developmental Biology

Abstract

Argos, a secreted inhibitor of the Drosophila epidermal growth factor receptor, and the only known secreted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acts by sequestering the EGFR ligand Spitz. We use computational modeling to show that this biochemically-determined mechanism of Argos action can explain available genetic data for EGFR/Spitz/Argos interactions in vivo. We find that efficient Spitz sequestration by Argos is key for explaining the existing data and for providing a robust feedback loop that modulates the Spitz gradient in embryonic ventral ectoderm patterning. Computational analysis of the EGFR/Spitz/Argos module in the ventral ectoderm shows that Argos need not be long-ranged to account for genetic data, and can actually have very short range. In our models, Argos with long or short length scale functions to limit the range and action of secreted Spitz. Thus, the spatial range of Argos does not have to be tightly regulated or may act at different ranges in distinct developmental contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.05.013

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tissue-level modeling has shown that the robustness of a pattern can generally be improved with negative feedback regulation.

    “For example, tissue-level modeling has shown that the robustness of a pattern can generally be improved with negative feedback regulation (Eldar et al. 2003;Reeves et al. 2005).”

    From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Reeves et al. 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reeves, G. T., Kalifa, R., Klein, D. E., Lemmon, M. A., & Shvartsman, S. Y.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Shvartsman, Stanislav Y.
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
284
Issue
2
Pages
523-535
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023121697
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA079992, BC030019, R01CA125432)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
Argos, epidermal growth factor receptor, Spitz, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition, feedback loops, Drosophila embryo
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Ectoderm, Enzyme Induction, Epidermal Growth Factor, Eye Proteins, Kinetics, Membrane Proteins, Models, Biological, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Genes, Insect, In Situ Hybridization, Gene Dosage, Computational Biology, Insect Proteins, Body Patterning, Feedback, Physiological, Drosophila Proteins, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review