Computational analysis of EGFR inhibition by Argos
Open accessAbstract
Argos, a secreted inhibitor of the Drosophila epidermal growth factor receptor, and the only known secreted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acts by sequestering the EGFR ligand Spitz. We use computational modeling to show that this biochemically-determined mechanism of Argos action can explain available genetic data for EGFR/Spitz/Argos interactions in vivo. We find that efficient Spitz sequestration by Argos is key for explaining the existing data and for providing a robust feedback loop that modulates the Spitz gradient in embryonic ventral ectoderm patterning. Computational analysis of the EGFR/Spitz/Argos module in the ventral ectoderm shows that Argos need not be long-ranged to account for genetic data, and can actually have very short range. In our models, Argos with long or short length scale functions to limit the range and action of secreted Spitz. Thus, the spatial range of Argos does not have to be tightly regulated or may act at different ranges in distinct developmental contexts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tissue-level modeling has shown that the robustness of a pattern can generally be improved with negative feedback regulation.
“For example, tissue-level modeling has shown that the robustness of a pattern can generally be improved with negative feedback regulation (Eldar et al. 2003;Reeves et al. 2005).”
From Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo. (2009) · cites this paper as Reeves et al. 2005
Cites
Schweitzer, R., Shaharabany, M., Seger, R., & Shilo, B. Z. (1995) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.9.12.1518 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Graded dorsal and differential gene regulation in the Drosophila embryo.
Reeves, G. T., & Stathopoulos, A. (2009) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a000836 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Reeves, G. T., Kalifa, R., Klein, D. E., Lemmon, M. A., & Shvartsman, S. Y.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shvartsman, Stanislav Y.
- Venue
- Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 523-535
- ISSN
- 0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023121697
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA079992, BC030019, R01CA125432)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
- Keywords
- Argos, epidermal growth factor receptor, Spitz, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibition, feedback loops, Drosophila embryo
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Ectoderm, Enzyme Induction, Epidermal Growth Factor, Eye Proteins, Kinetics, Membrane Proteins, Models, Biological, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Genes, Insect, In Situ Hybridization, Gene Dosage, Computational Biology, Insect Proteins, Body Patterning, Feedback, Physiological, Drosophila Proteins, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Proteins, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review