Cited by 138Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Zebrafish Foxd3 is required for development of a subset of neural crest derivatives

Open access
Lister, James A., Cooper, Cynthia, Nguyen, Kim, Modrell, Melinda, Grant, Kelly, Raible, David W.·2006·Developmental Biology

Abstract

foxd3 encodes a winged helix/forkhead class transcription factor expressed in the premigratory neural crest cells of many vertebrates. We have investigated the function of this gene in zebrafish neural crest by a loss of function approach using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides and immunostaining for Foxd3 protein. Knockdown of Foxd3 expression produces deficits in several differentiated neural crest derivatives, including jaw cartilage, peripheral neurons, and glia, and iridophore pigment cells. Other derivatives, such as melanophore and xanthophore pigment cells are not affected. Reduction in the expression of several lineage-specific markers becomes evident soon after the onset of neural crest migration, suggesting that Foxd3 knockdown affects these lineages at early stages in their development. In contrast, analysis of the expression of early neural crest markers indicates little effect on neural crest induction or initial emigration. Finally, cell transplantation suggests that with respect to dorsal root ganglia neurons the Foxd3 requirement is cell autonomous, although Foxd3 itself is not detectable in differentiated DRG neurons. These results suggest that in zebrafish Foxd3 may not be required for induction of neural crest identity but is necessary for the differentiation of a subset of neural crest cell fates, perhaps in precursors of particular neural crest lineages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.014

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At 18 hpf, neither mitfa nor ltk and pnp4a are detectable by WISH in tfec-positive neural crest cells of the trunk.

    “At this stage neither the melanoblast marker mitfa nor two other early iridoblast markers ltk and pnp4a were detectable by WISH in tfec-positive NCCs of the trunk (Fig 1B) [9], [44].”

    From A systems biology approach uncovers the core gene regulatory network governing iridophore fate choice from the neural crest (2018) · cites this paper as [44]

    The section ‘Foxd3 is largely dispensable for neural crest induction’ discusses mitfa expression, and ‘In situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry’ lists mitfa as a probe, but neither establishes whether mitfa is undetectable in tfec-positive trunk cells at 18 hpf. Searches for tfec, ltk, and pnp4a found no passage in our copy addressing that observation. Page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Clevidence, D.E., Overdier, D.G., Tao, W., Qian, X., Pani, L., Lai, E., Costa, R.H., 1993. Identification of nine tissue-specific transcription factors of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 3/forkhead DNA-binding-domain family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 3948 -3952.
  2. Shimeld, S.M., Holland, P.W., 2000. Vertebrate innovations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 4449 -4452.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lister, J. A., Cooper, C., Nguyen, K., Modrell, M., Grant, K., & Raible, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lister, James A.
  • Raible, David W.
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
290
Issue
1
Pages
92-104
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025903846
Cited by
138
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P01GM065469)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (T32HD007183)
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
FOXD3, neural crest, zebrafish, neural crest derivatives, peripheral neurons, glia, dorsal root ganglia, neural crest migration, transcription factors, cell transplantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cartilage, Cell Differentiation, Cell Movement, Ganglia, Spinal, Jaw, Melanophores, Neural Crest, Neuroglia, Neurons, Pigment Epithelium of Eye, Zebrafish, Oligonucleotides, Antisense, Cell Transplantation, Cell Lineage, Body Patterning, Zebrafish Proteins, Forkhead Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review