The C2H2 zinc finger genes of Strongylocentrotus purpuratus and their expression in embryonic development
Open accessAbstract
The C2H2 zinc finger is one of the most abundant protein domains and is thought to have been extensively replicated in diverse animal clades. Some well-studied proteins that contain this domain are transcriptional regulators. As part of an attempt to delineate all transcription factors encoded in the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus genome, we identified the C2H2 zinc finger genes indicated in the sequence, and examined their involvement in embryonic development. We found 377 zinc finger genes in the sea urchin genome, about half the number found in mice or humans. Their expression was measured by quantitative PCR. Up to the end of gastrulation less than a third of these genes is expressed, and about 75% of the expressed genes are maternal; both parameters distinguish these from all other classes of regulatory genes as measured in other studies. Spatial expression pattern was determined by whole mount in situ hybridization for 43 genes transcribed at a sufficient level, and localized expression was observed in diverse embryonic tissues. These genes may execute important regulatory functions in development. However, the functional meaning of the majority of this large gene family remains undefined.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The sea urchin genome lacks several insect-specific protein domains and the vertebrate KRAB domain.
“Also missing are several protein domains unique to insects, such as insect cuticle protein, chitin-binding protein, and several pheromone-or odorant-binding proteins, as well as a vertebrate invention-the Krüppel-associated box or KRAB domain, a repressor domain in zinc finger transcription factors (12).”
From The Genome of the Sea Urchin <i>Strongylocentrotus purpuratus</i> (2006) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 101
- Authors
- Materna, S. C., Howard-Ashby, M., Gray, R. F., & Davidson, E. H.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Davidson, Eric H.
- ORCID
- Materna, Stefan C.
- Venue
- Developmental Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 300
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 108-120
- ISSN
- 0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996892469
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biological and Environmental Research
- National Institutes of Health (HD37105)
- Office of Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Echinoderm biology and ecology
- Keywords
- Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, sea urchin embryonic development, transcription factors, maternal gene expression, gastrulation, gene family expansion, spatial gene expression, whole-mount in situ hybridization, gene expression profiling
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Phylogeny, Sea Urchins, Transcription, Genetic, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Zinc Fingers, In Situ Hybridization, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review