Cited by 79Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies

Expression of Hoxa2 in rhombomere 4 is regulated by a conserved cross-regulatory mechanism dependent upon Hoxb1

Open access
Tümpel, Stefan, Cambronero, Francisco, Ferretti, Elisabetta, Blasi, Francesco, Wiedemann, Leanne M., Krumlauf, Robb·2007·Developmental Biology

Abstract

The Hoxa2 gene is an important component of regulatory events during hindbrain segmentation and head development in vertebrates. In this study we have used sequenced comparisons of the Hoxa2 locus from 12 vertebrate species in combination with detailed regulatory analyses in mouse and chicken embryos to characterize the mechanistic basis for the regulation of Hoxa2 in rhombomere (r) 4. A highly conserved region in the Hoxa2 intron functions as an r4 enhancer. In vitro binding studies demonstrate that within the conserved region three bipartite Hox/Pbx binding sites (PH1-PH3) in combination with a single binding site for Pbx-Prep/Meis (PM) heterodimers co-operate to regulate enhancer activity in r4. Mutational analysis reveals that these sites are required for activity of the enhancer, suggesting that the r4 enhancer from Hoxa2 functions in vivo as a Hox-response module in combination with the Hox cofactors, Pbx and Prep/Meis. Furthermore, this r4 enhancer is capable of mediating a response to ectopic HOXB1 expression in the hindbrain. These findings reveal that Hoxa2 is a target gene of Hoxb1 and permit us to develop a gene regulatory network for r4, whereby Hoxa2, along with Hoxb1, Hoxb2 and Hoxa1, is integrated into a series of auto- and cross-regulatory loops between Hox genes. These data highlight the important role played by direct cross-talk between Hox genes in regulating hindbrain patterning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.029

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anterior group hoxa and hoxb genes, together with krox and Kreisler, establish recursively wired, extremely conserved, rhombomere-specific GRNs.

    “Together with other important regulatory genes such as krox and Kreisler, the anterior group hoxa and hoxb genes establish recursively wired, extremely conserved, rhombomere specific GRNs (Tumpel et al., 2007; 2009).”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Tumpel et al., 2007

    The section “A model for the gene regulatory network specifying r4 identity” (page unavailable) describes a rhombomere-4 Hox network with highly conserved auto- and cross-regulatory mechanisms. The paper also discusses Krox20-dependent regulation in rhombomeres 3 and 5, but the passages do not establish the broader claim that anterior hoxa and hoxb genes together with Krox and Kreisler form extremely conserved, rhombomere-specific networks; a search for Kreisler found no relevant passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individual hox genes sometimes act by participating in patterning GRNs, for example in early hindbrain specification, a Box I function.

    “Sometimes individual hox genes act by participating, like any other regulatory genes in patterning GRNs, for example in early hindbrain specification, a Box I function.”

    From Evolution of Gene Regulatory Networks Controlling Body Plan Development (2011) · cites this paper as Tumpel et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 79

Authors
Tümpel, S., Cambronero, F., Ferretti, E., Blasi, F., Wiedemann, L. M., & Krumlauf, R.
Affiliations
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Wiedemann, Leanne M.
  • Krumlauf, Robb
Venue
Developmental Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
302
Issue
2
Pages
646-660
ISSN
0012-1606 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2001837863
Cited by
79
References
76
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Keywords
Hoxa2, Hoxb1, rhombomere 4, hindbrain segmentation, enhancer regulation, head development, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Chick Embryo, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Rhombencephalon, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Conserved Sequence, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review