Cited by 20Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesEpilepsy research and treatmentGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The unexpected role of copy number variations in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy

Helbig, Ingo, Hartmann, Corinna, Mefford, Heather C.·2013·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Structural genomic variants or copy number variants (CNVs) comprise submicroscopic deletions and duplications of chromosomal material, including both rearrangements at genomic hotspots as well as duplications and deletions with unique breakpoints. Copy number variants have increasingly been recognized in the Idiopathic/Genetic Generalized Epilepsies (IGE/GGE) including juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME). Microdeletions at 15q13.3, 15q11.2, and 16p13.11 are genetic risk factors that can be identified in 3% of patients with IGE including JME. These microdeletions, however, also represent genetic risk factors to a broad range of other neurodevelopmental disorders. Additionally, 6% of patients with GGE carry other, potentially pathogenic structural genomic variants. While family studies largely support the channelopathy concept of the idiopathic epilepsies, the results of studies investigating copy number variations suggest that JME genetically overlaps with a broad range of other neurodevelopmental disorders. In addition, the particular genetic properties of structural genomic variations as rare genetic variants highlight the complexity of the genetic architecture of human disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.07.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The medical literature indicates that the 15q11.2 BP1-BP2 microdeletion may be a risk factor for epilepsy.

    “The medical literature surrounding this microdeletion syndrome and seizures indicate that this chromosomal anomaly may be a risk factor for epilepsy [29,41,42,43].”

    From The 15q11.2 BP1–BP2 Microdeletion Syndrome: A Review (2015) · cites this paper as [41]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 20

Authors
Helbig, I., Hartmann, C., & Mefford, H. C.
Affiliations
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Helbig, Ingo
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
28
Pages
S66-S68
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090674424
Cited by
20
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
copy number variation, juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, structural variants, genetic risk factors, genetic architecture of disease, idiopathic generalized epilepsy
MeSH terms
Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review