Dual diagnosis of epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Systematic review and meta-analysis of frequency, correlates, and outcomes
Open accessAbstract
Comorbid epilepsy and psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) represent a serious challenge for the clinicians. However, the frequency, associations, and outcomes of dual diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES are unclear. The aim of the review was to determine the frequency, correlates, and outcomes of a dual diagnosis. A systematic review of all published observational studies (from inception to Dec. 2016) was conducted to determine the frequency, correlates, and outcomes of dual diagnosis. We included studies of individuals of any age reporting a dual diagnosis of epilepsy and PNES. All observational study designs were included with the exception of case reports and case series with fewer than 10 participants. The mean frequency of epilepsy in patients with PNES across all studies was 22% (95% confidence intervals [CI] 20 to 25%, range: 0% to 90%) while the mean frequency of PNES in patients with epilepsy was 12% (95% CI 10 to 14%, range: 1% to 62%). High heterogeneity means that these pooled estimates should be viewed with caution. A number of correlates of dual diagnosis were reported. Some studies delineated differences in semiology of seizures in patients with dual diagnosis vs. PNES or epilepsy only. However, most of the correlates were inconclusive. Only a few studies examined outcome in patients with dual diagnosis. Dual diagnosis is common in clinical practice, especially among patients referred to specialized services, and requires careful diagnosis and management.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FND comorbidity is well recognized for other neurological conditions.
“This kind of FND comorbidity is well recognized for other neurological conditions.”
From Functional neurological disorder and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of misdiagnosis and clinical overlap (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
Up to 20% of patients with dissociative non-epileptic seizures have a history of, or comorbid, epilepsy.
“up to 20% of patients with dissociative non-epileptic seizures have a history of, or comorbid, epilepsy [39]”
From Functional neurological disorder and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of misdiagnosis and clinical overlap (2022) · cites this paper as [39]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 114 · Cited by 205
- Authors
- Kutlubaev, M. A., Xu, Y., Hackett, M. L., & Stone, J.
- Affiliations
- Bashkir State Medical University (RU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kutlubaev, Mansur A.
- Venue
- Epilepsy & Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-12
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 70-78
- ISSN
- 1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899138141
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- epilepsy, psychogenic non-epileptic seizures, dual diagnosis, comorbidities, seizure semiology, clinical outcomes, diagnosis and management
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Seizures, Comorbidity, Treatment Outcome, Diagnosis, Dual (Psychiatry)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review