Cited by 28Epilepsy research and treatmentGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Association of apolipoprotein E genotypes with epilepsy risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liang, Yifan, Zhou, Zhike, Wang, Huibin, Cheng, Xi, Zhong, Shanshan, Zhao, Chuansheng·2019·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to identify the association between certain genotypes or alleles of the APOE (Apolipoprotein E) gene and the epilepsy risk. Methods All studies on human APOE genotypes associated with epilepsy were included. Separate meta-analyses were conducted between the patients with epilepsy and the control group from the following three aspects: ε4 carriers or ε2 carriers vs ε3/ε3 (the ε2/ε4 genotype was excluded), ε4 carriers vs ε2 carriers, and five genotypes vs ε3/ε3. The subgroup analysis was conducted on the ethnicity, the control group was healthy or not, and type of epilepsy. Results Nine studies with 2210 individuals were included. Compared with ε3/ε3 genotype, ε4 carriers increased the epilepsy risk (odds ratios [ORs]: 1.27; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 1.01 to 1.59; P = 0.042), while ε2 carriers had no association with epilepsy risk (OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.18; P = 0.184). The risk of epilepsy was 1.45 times greater in ε4 carriers compared with ε2 carriers (OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.04; P = 0.037). When the number of APOE ε4 allele increased, the ORs increased progressively (no ε4 alleles, OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.18; one ε4 allele, OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 0.99 to 1.57; two ε4 alleles, OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 0.83 to 4.10). Apolipoprotein E ε4 carriers had a higher epilepsy risk in the population without primary diseases (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.88), and a higher risk in Asian populations (OR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.49). Conclusion…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.06.015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, Y., Zhou, Z., Wang, H., Cheng, X., Zhong, S., & Zhao, C.
Affiliations
  • First Hospital of China Medical University (CN)
  • First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Chuansheng
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
98
Issue
Pt A
Pages
27-35
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2956964813
Cited by
28
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Key Research and Development Project of Hainan Province (2017225005)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, epilepsy risk, genetic susceptibility, Asian populations, epilepsy subtypes, genetic polymorphism, Alzheimer's disease risk genes, genetic association meta-analysis, subgroup analysis
MeSH terms
Alleles, Apolipoproteins E, Epilepsy, Genotype, Heterozygote, Humans, Risk Factors, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review