Cited by 1Health Literacy and Information AccessibilitySocial Media in Health EducationVagus Nerve Stimulation Research

Youtube as a source of information vagal nerve stimulation: A quality analysis

Özçelik, Aysima, Özbaş, Cansu, Arhan, Ebru·2024·Epilepsy & Behavior

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the quality of available information on Youtube videos about VNS as a "source of health information" for patients with drug resistant epilepsy.Methods Youtube videos were searched and screened using the terms "VNS for seizures," and "VNS surgery," "VNS epilepsy" in May 2023. The quality of the videos was evaluated the Quality Criteria for Consumer Health Information (DISCERN) and Global Quality Scale (GQS). The videos were analyzed in terms of content, accuracy, reliability, and quality.Results A total of 104 videos were searched. After excluding duplicate or inappropriate videos, 51 videos were analyzed. Youtube videos about vagal nerve stimulation are mostly on general information, surgical procedures, patient experiences and magnet use. When video sources are examined according to the quality, according to GQS, 75 % of high quality videos were narrated by physicians, all intermediate quality videos were narrated by physicians, and low quality ones narrated by physicians were 47.4 % and 28.9 % by the patients. All of the videos narrated by the patients were of low quality. There was a significant and strong correlation between GQS and Discern score (r = 0.807, p < 0.001). Only GQS scores of videos with different content were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). Two pediatric neurologists independently reviewed the videos and classified the videos as useful or misleading according to the GQS, DISCERN scala. The overall κ value for interobserver consistency according to Global Quality Scale was 0.781 (p < 0.001). (95 % confidence interval), indicating a very good level of agreement.Conclusion Youtube videos may provide a worthful source for patients and parents seeking to find more information about VNS However incorrect information could easily be disseminated by high number of views of videos with low quality. High skilled and experienced professionals should create videos on Youtube to ensure that patients and parents can access more useful, high-quality, and accurate information on VNS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109597

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 1

Authors
Özçelik, A., Özbaş, C., & Arhan, E.
Affiliations
  • Gaziantep University (TR)
  • Gazi University (TR)
Corresponding author
Arhan, Ebru
Venue
Epilepsy & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
151
Pages
109597
ISSN
1525-5050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390600571
Cited by
1
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Epilepsy & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, YouTube, online health information quality, drug-resistant epilepsy, DISCERN, Global Quality Scale, video reliability, interobserver agreement
MeSH terms
Benzophenones, Child, Humans, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Information Dissemination, Vagus Nerve Stimulation, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review