Cited by 74Pluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability researchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Modeling neurogenesis impairment in down syndrome with induced pluripotent stem cells from Trisomy 21 amniotic fluid cells

Lu, Huai-En, Yang, Yao-Chen, Chen, Sheng-Mei, Su, Hong-Lin, Huang, Pai-Cheng, Tsai, Ming-Song, Wang, Tzu-Hao, Tseng, Ching-Ping +1 more·2013·Experimental Cell Research

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS), or Trisomy 21 (T21) syndrome, one of the most common chromosomal abnormalities, is caused by an extra duplication of chromosome 21. In studies of neuron development, experimental models based on human cells are considered to be the most desired and accurate for basic research. The generation of diseased induced pluripotetn stem (iPS) cell is a critical step in understanding the developmental stages of complex neuronal diseases. Here, we generated human DS iPS cell lines from second trimester amniotic fluid (AF) cells with T21 by co-expressing Yamanaka factors through lentiviral delivery and subsequently differentiated them into neuronal progenitor cells (NPCs) for further analyses. T21 AF-iPS cells were characterized for the expression of pluripotent markers and for their ability to differentiate into all three germ layers by forming embryoid bodies in vitro and teratomas in vivo. The T21 AF-iPS cells maintained their unique pattern of chromosomal karyotypes: three pairs of chromosome 21. The level of amyloid precursor protein was significantly increased in NPCs derived from T21 AF-iPS cells compared with NPCs from normal AF-iPS cells. The expression levels of miR-155 and miR-802 in T21 AF-iPS-NPCs were highly elevated in the presence of low expression of MeCP2. We observed that T21 iPS-NPCs generated fewer neurons compared with controls. T21 iPS-NPCs exhibit developmental defects during neurogenesis. Our findings suggest that T21 AF-iPS cells serve as a g…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.09.017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results from induced pluripotent stem cell studies of neurogenesis are discordant: the generation of neurons from induced pluripotent stem cells has been reported in some studies to be impaired and in others not to be impaired, which may be explained by technical differences in the cell lines and protocols used.

    “However, results from these studies are discordant: the generation of neurons from iPSCs has been reported in some studies to be impaired74,77–79 and in others not to be impaired75,80,81, which may be explained by technical differences in the cell lines and protocols used (see Box 1).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 27 · Cited by 74

Authors
Lu, H.-E., Yang, Y.-C., Chen, S.-M., Su, H.-L., Huang, P.-C., Tsai, M.-S., Wang, T.-H., Tseng, C.-P., & Hwang, S.-M.
Affiliations
  • National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
  • Food Industry Research and Development Institute (TW)
  • National Chung Hsing University (TW)
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
Corresponding author
  • Tseng, Ching-Ping
  • Hwang, Shiaw-Min
Venue
Experimental Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
319
Issue
4
Pages
498-505
ISSN
0014-4827 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1983873031
Cited by
74
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Cell Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taiwan (100-EC-17-A-17-R7-0525)
  • National Research program of Biopharmaceutics (NRPB, DOH100-TD-PB-111-TM020)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Down syndrome, induced pluripotent stem cells, amniotic fluid cells, neural progenitor cells, amyloid precursor protein, miR-155, miR-802, MeCP2, Alzheimer's disease, lentiviral reprogramming, iPSC differentiation
MeSH terms
Amniotic Fluid, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cells, Cultured, Down Syndrome, Female, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Neurons, Pregnancy, Mice, SCID, Mice, Inbred NOD, Mice, Neurogenesis, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review