Cited by 265Sexual Differentiation and DisordersNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

When is a sex difference not a sex difference?

McCarthy, Margaret M., Konkle, Anne T.M.·2005·Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Brain sexual differentiation in mammals requires activity of gonadal hormones; organizational effects of these steroids on brain development occur early in life while activational ones in adulthood ensure appropriate and timely sex-specific behaviors. This traditional view has long served as a reliable model for sexual differentiation of reproductively relevant brain structures. Here, we take a fresh look at this model but refocused in the context of sexual differentiation of non-reproductive parameters and with an emphasis on the hippocampus, a telencephalic brain structure predominantly involved in cognition and stress regulation. We explore sex differences in morphology, neurochemistry, and hippocampal-dependent behaviors to propose a new prototype that can be used to explain and further investigate the effects of steroid hormones, those synthesized gonadally or intracerebrally, on hippocampal development and function. We also propose that a new vernacular be employed, one that distinguishes hormonally modulated responses from sex differences, and argue these are mechanistically and functionally distinct. Understanding when and how the sexes are different is as important as understanding when and how they are the same, at the biological, social, and cultural level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yfrne.2005.06.001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 171 · Cited by 265

Authors
McCarthy, M. M., & Konkle, A. T. M.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Margaret M.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
85-102
ISSN
0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086737049
Cited by
265
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH-52716, R01MH052716)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
sex differences, sexual differentiation of the brain, sex steroids, hippocampus, organizational effects, activational effects, hippocampal development, hippocampal-dependent behavior, neurochemistry, stress regulation, cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Estradiol, Female, Hippocampus, Learning, Male, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Characteristics, Sex Differentiation, Spatial Behavior, Steroids, Stress, Physiological, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Amino Acids, Long-Term Synaptic Depression, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review