When is a sex difference not a sex difference?
Abstract
Brain sexual differentiation in mammals requires activity of gonadal hormones; organizational effects of these steroids on brain development occur early in life while activational ones in adulthood ensure appropriate and timely sex-specific behaviors. This traditional view has long served as a reliable model for sexual differentiation of reproductively relevant brain structures. Here, we take a fresh look at this model but refocused in the context of sexual differentiation of non-reproductive parameters and with an emphasis on the hippocampus, a telencephalic brain structure predominantly involved in cognition and stress regulation. We explore sex differences in morphology, neurochemistry, and hippocampal-dependent behaviors to propose a new prototype that can be used to explain and further investigate the effects of steroid hormones, those synthesized gonadally or intracerebrally, on hippocampal development and function. We also propose that a new vernacular be employed, one that distinguishes hormonally modulated responses from sex differences, and argue these are mechanistically and functionally distinct. Understanding when and how the sexes are different is as important as understanding when and how they are the same, at the biological, social, and cultural level.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Compensatory mechanisms to reduce overt sex differences in some behaviors have been proposed previously.
“Compensatory mechanisms to reduce overt sex differences in some behaviors have been proposed previously (40,41), and it is possible that NCoR may be a molecule involved in reducing some sex differences in social play behavior.”
From The Nuclear Receptor Corepressor Has Organizational Effects within the Developing Amygdala on Juvenile Social Play and Anxiety-Like Behavior (2010) · cites this paper as [41]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 171 · Cited by 265
- Authors
- McCarthy, M. M., & Konkle, A. T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCarthy, Margaret M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 85-102
- ISSN
- 0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086737049
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 171
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH-52716, R01MH052716)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
- Keywords
- sex differences, sexual differentiation of the brain, sex steroids, hippocampus, organizational effects, activational effects, hippocampal development, hippocampal-dependent behavior, neurochemistry, stress regulation, cognition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Estradiol, Female, Hippocampus, Learning, Male, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Characteristics, Sex Differentiation, Spatial Behavior, Steroids, Stress, Physiological, Long-Term Potentiation, Excitatory Amino Acids, Long-Term Synaptic Depression, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review