Social buffering of the stress response: diversity, mechanisms, and functions
Abstract
Protracted or repeated activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system is associated with a variety of physical and psychological pathologies. Studies dating back to the 1970s have documented many cases in which the presence of a social companion can moderate HPA responses to stressors. However, there also are many cases in which this "social buffering" of the HPA axis is not observed. An examination of the literature indicates that the nature of the relationship between individuals is crucial in determining whether or not social buffering of the HPA response will occur. Other factors that affect social buffering, either directly or by influencing the social relationship, include the social organization of the species, previous experience, gender, integration into a social unit, and the developmental stage at which individuals are examined. Current evidence suggests that social buffering involves mechanisms acting at more than one level of the CNS. It is suggested that, in addition to promoting health, social buffering may have evolved to direct the establishment of social relationships, and to facilitate developmental transitions in social interactions appropriate for different life stages.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social buffering describes the reduction of both the stress response and release of stress hormones, and has been observed in myriad species and throughout the lifespan.
“Social buffering is a phenomenon that has been observed in myriad species and throughout the lifespan and describes the reduction of both the stress response and release of stress hormones (Ditzen and Heinrichs, 2014, Hennessy et al., 2009, Hostinar et al., 2015, Kikusui et al., 2006, Sanchez et al., 2015, Sullivan and Perry, 2015, Takahashi et al., 2013).”
From Early life adversity during the infant sensitive period for attachment: Programming of behavioral neurobiology of threat processing and social behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Hennessy et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 148 · Cited by 477
- Authors
- Hennessy, M. B., Kaiser, S., & Sachser, N.
- Affiliations
- Wright State University (US)
- University of Münster (DE)
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470-482
- ISSN
- 0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086963885
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 148
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 0.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CORE Scholar (Wright State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- social buffering, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, stress response, interpersonal relationships, social organization, gender differences, developmental stages, social integration, evolution of social behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Interpersonal Relations, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Social Behavior, Social Support, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review