Feed-forward mechanisms: Addiction-like behavioral and molecular adaptations in overeating
Abstract
Food reward, not hunger, is the main driving force behind eating in the modern obesogenic environment. Palatable foods, generally calorie-dense and rich in sugar/fat, are thus readily overconsumed despite the resulting health consequences. Important advances have been made to explain mechanisms underlying excessive consumption as an immediate response to presentation of rewarding tastants. However, our understanding of long-term neural adaptations to food reward that oftentimes persist during even a prolonged absence of palatable food and contribute to the reinstatement of compulsive overeating of high-fat high-sugar diets, is much more limited. Here we discuss the evidence from animal and human studies for neural and molecular adaptations in both homeostatic and non-homeostatic appetite regulation that may underlie the formation of a "feed-forward" system, sensitive to palatable food and propelling the individual from a basic preference for palatable diets to food craving and compulsive, addiction-like eating behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increasing body weight above healthy lean levels results in changes in glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity, and hormones such as leptin, ghrelin, NPY, orexin, hypocretin, and GLP-1, which regulate appetite and energy homeostasis.
“Increasing body weight above healthy lean levels results in changes in glucose metabolism, insulin sensitivity and hormones, such as leptin, ghrelin, NPY, orexin and hypocretin, [GLP-1] which, in turn, regulate appetite and energy homeostasis”
From Role of addiction and stress neurobiology on food intake and obesity (2018) · cites this paper as Alsio et al., 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 252 · Cited by 81
- Authors
- Alsiö, J., Olszewski, P. K., Levine, A. S., & Schiöth, H. B.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alsiö, Johan
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-139
- ISSN
- 0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154458038
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 252
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Brain Research Foundation
- Vetenskapsrådet
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Keywords
- overeating, food reward, feed-forward mechanism, compulsive eating, high-fat high-sugar diet, food cravings, neural adaptation, molecular adaptation, appetite regulation, palatable food, obesity
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Brain, Compulsive Behavior, Humans, Hyperphagia, Models, Cardiovascular, Reward, Signal Transduction, Behavior, Addictive, Substance-Related Disorders, Feedback, Physiological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review