Cited by 58Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeuroscience and Music PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

Storing maternal memories: hypothesizing an interaction of experience and estrogen on sensory cortical plasticity to learn infant cues

Open access
Banerjee, Sunayana B., Liu, Robert C.·2013·Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

Much of the literature on maternal behavior has focused on the role of infant experience and hormones in a canonical subcortical circuit for maternal motivation and maternal memory. Although early studies demonstrated that the cerebral cortex also plays a significant role in maternal behaviors, little has been done to explore what that role may be. Recent work though has provided evidence that the cortex, particularly sensory cortices, contains correlates of sensory memories of infant cues, consistent with classical studies of experience-dependent sensory cortical plasticity in non-maternal paradigms. By reviewing the literature from both the maternal behavior and sensory cortical plasticity fields, focusing on the auditory modality, we hypothesize that maternal hormones (predominantly estrogen) may act to prime auditory cortical neurons for a longer-lasting neural trace of infant vocal cues, thereby facilitating recognition and discrimination. This couldthen more efficiently activate the subcortical circuit to elicit and sustain maternal behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.07.008

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 203 · Cited by 58

Authors
Banerjee, S. B., & Liu, R. C.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Liu, Robert C.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
300-314
ISSN
0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093599646
Cited by
58
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-008343, R01DC008343)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
maternal behavior, maternal memory, estrogen, auditory cortex, experience-dependent plasticity, maternal motivation, subcortical circuits, auditory memory
MeSH terms
Animals, Cues, Estrogens, Humans, Infant, Learning, Memory, Mother-Child Relations, Neuronal Plasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review