Sex differences in how inflammation affects behavior: what we can learn from experimental inflammatory models in humans
Abstract
Human models demonstrate that experimental activation of the innate immune system has profound effects on brain activation and behavior, inducing fatigue, worsened mood and pain sensitivity. It has been proposed that inflammation is a mechanism involved in the etiology and maintenance of depression, chronic pain and long-term fatigue. These diseases show a strong female overrepresentation, suggesting that a better understanding of sex differences in how inflammation drives behavior could help the development of individualized treatment interventions. For this purpose, we here review sex differences in studies using experimental inflammatory models to investigate changes in brain activity and behavior. We suggest a model in which inflammation accentuates sex differences in brain networks and pre-existing vulnerability factors. This effect could render women more vulnerable to the detrimental effects of immune-to-brain communication over time. We call for systematic and large scale investigations of vulnerability factors for women in the behavioral response to inflammation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Experimentally induced inflammation in healthy humans and rodents increases pain sensitivity, decreases mood, and changes motivational behaviors.
“Experimentally induced inflammation in healthy humans and rodents increases pain sensitivity, decreases mood and changes motivational behaviors, see, e.g., [20,21,22,23] for an overview.”
From Baseline Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels Moderate Psychological Inflexibility in Behavioral Treatment for Chronic Pain (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Studies including both sexes have revealed prominent sex differences in psychological response to an inflammatory stimulus.
“Studies that have included both male and female participants have revealed prominent sex differences in the psychological response to an inflammatory stimulus (See Lasselin et al., 2018 for review).”
From The role of inflammation in core features of depression: Insights from paradigms using exogenously-induced inflammation. (2018) · cites this paper as Lasselin et al., 2018
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 223 · Cited by 106
- Authors
- Lasselin, J., Lekander, M., Axelsson, J., & Karshikoff, B.
- Affiliations
- Stockholm University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Karshikoff, Bianka
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 91-106
- ISSN
- 0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2809493154
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 223
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Stress Research Institute
- Stockholm University
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience
- Karolinska Institutet
- Stockholm Stress Center
- Swedish Research Council (2017-00489)
- Swedish Society of Medicine (SLS-691251)
- Sweden and America Foundation
- Fulbright Commission Sweden
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- sex differences, inflammation, innate immune system, depression, chronic pain, chronic fatigue, brain activation, mood, pain sensitivity, brain networks
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Sex Characteristics, Illness Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review