Seasonal rhythms of salivary cortisol secretion in captive Asian elephants (Elephas maximus)
Abstract
Salivary cortisol has been recently used to assess welfare of captive and free-ranging animals. However, rhythms of cortisol secretion may vary annually and thus, it is necessary to take into account these rhythms when evaluating the physiological significance of fluctuations of this hormone throughout the year as stress indicator in animals. Here, we analyze monthly differences in cortisol secretion in Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) during a year. Saliva samples of eight adult female Asian elephants were collected and analyzed using Radioimmunoassay. Results revealed an overall seasonal pattern of salivary cortisol secretion and significant differences in cortisol concentration among months were found. Overall, the highest cortisol levels were recorded in October, and then decreased until reaching the lowest concentration in April. However, some individual variations were found respect this annual overall trend. The occurrence of this annual pattern of cortisol secretion should be taken into account when using cortisol as a tool to assess animal welfare in captive animal at zoological parks, as well as it opens new questions to further analyze this pattern and its variations, as well as the endogenous mechanisms controlling it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seasonality in cortisol or its metabolites is evident in African and Asian elephants and so must be considered when evaluating the physiological significance of fluctuations as stress indicators.
“Similarly, seasonality in cortisol or its metabolites is evident in African (112) and Asian (113) elephants and so must be considered when evaluating the physiological significance of fluctuations as stress indicators.”
From Comparison of animal welfare assessment tools and methodologies: need for an effective approach for captive elephants in Asia (2024) · cites this paper as [113]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 30
- Authors
- Menargues Marcilla, A., Urios, V., & Limiñana, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Alicante (ES)
- ORCID
- Limiñana, Rubén
- Venue
- General and Comparative Endocrinology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 176
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-264
- ISSN
- 0016-6480 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018661778
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- General and Comparative Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
- Keywords
- salivary cortisol, seasonal rhythms, Asian elephant, captive animal welfare, stress symptoms, zoos, annual variation, interindividual variability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Elephants, Female, Hydrocortisone, Seasons, Stress, Physiological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review