Cited by 82Animal Behavior and ReproductionReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Social regulation of reproduction in male cichlid fishes

Open access
Maruska, Karen P.·2014·General and Comparative Endocrinology

Abstract

Social interactions and relative positions within a dominance hierarchy have helped shape the evolution of reproduction in many animals. Since reproduction is crucial in all animals, and rank typically regulates access to reproductive opportunities, understanding the mechanisms that regulate socially-induced reproductive processes is extremely important. How does position in a dominance hierarchy impact an individual's reproductive behavior, morphology, and physiology? Teleost fishes, and cichlids in particular, are ideally-suited models for studying how social status influences reproduction on multiple levels of biological organization. Here I review the current knowledge on the reproductive behavioral and physiological consequences of relative position in a dominance hierarchy, with a particular focus on male cichlids. Dominant and subordinate social status is typically associated with distinct differences in activity along the entire hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. Further, when transitions in social status occur between subordinate and dominant individuals, there are plastic changes from whole-organism behavior to molecular-level gene expression modifications that occur quickly. These rapid changes in behavior and physiology have allowed cichlids the flexibility to adapt to and thrive in their often dynamic physical and social environments. Studies in cichlid fishes have, and will continue, to advance our understanding of how the social environment can modulate molecular, cellular, and behavioral outcomes relevant to reproductive success. Future studies that take advantage of the extreme diversity in mating systems, reproductive tactics, and parental care strategies within the cichlid group will help generate hypotheses and careful experimental tests on the mechanisms governing the social control of reproduction in many vertebrates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.04.038

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the brain, increases in immediate early gene (IEG) activity are observed during social ascent throughout the social decision-making network (SDMN) as well as several other brain regions including the prefrontal cortex.

    “Within the brain, increases in immediate early gene (IEG) activity is observed during social ascent throughout the social decision-making network (SDMN), a system of evolutionarily conserved interconnected fore- and midbrain nuclei that strongly coordinate social behavior [3,13], as well as several other brain regions including the prefrontal cortex [14,15].”

    From Rapid changes in plasma corticosterone and medial amygdala transcriptome profiles during social status change reveal molecular pathways associated with a major life history transition in mouse dominance hierarchies (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    Section 4.2, “Social status and the brain” (page unavailable), reports increased immediate early gene activity in social-information-processing regions, including the SDMN, within 30 minutes of social ascent in male A. burtoni. It does not report activation in the prefrontal cortex, the region named in the clause to which the later citations are attached. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Antunes, R.A., Oliveira, R.F., 2009. Hormonal anticipation of territorial challenges in cichlid fish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15985-15989.
  2. Balshine-Earn, S., Earn, D.J.D., 1998. On the evolutionary pathway of parental care in mouth-brooding cichlid fishes. Proc. R. Soc. B. 265, 2217-2222.
  3. Chen, C.C., Fernald, R.D., 2008. Sequences expression patterns and regulation of the corticotropin-releasing factor system in a teleost. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 157 (2), 148-155.
  4. Fernald, R.D., Maruska, K.P., 2012. Social information changes the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109 (Suppl 2), 17194-17199.
  5. Francis, R.C., Soma, K., Fernald, R.D., 1993. Social regulation of the brain-pituitary- gonadal axis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7794-7798.
  6. Friedman, M., Keck, B.P., Dornburg, A., Eytan, R.I., Martin, C.H., Hulsey, C.D., et al., 2013. Molecular and fossil evidence place the origin of cichlid fishes long after Gondwanan rifting. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20131733.
  7. Greenwood, A.K., Wark, A.R., Fernald, R.D., Hofmann, H.A., 2008. Expression of arginine vasotocin in distinct preoptic regions is associated with dominant and subordinate behaviour in an African cichlid fish. Proc. Biol. Sci. 275, 2393-2402.
  8. Kustan, J.M., Maruska, K.P., Fernald, R.D., 2012. Subordinate male cichlids retain reproductive competence during social suppression. Proc. R. Soc. B. 279, 434-443.
  9. Maruska, K.P., Fernald, R.D., 2014. Social regulation of gene expression in the African cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni. In: Canli, T. (Ed.), Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press.
  10. Oliveira, R.F., Taborsky, M., Brockmann, H.J., 2008. Alternative Reproductive Tactics: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  11. Taborsky, M., Brockmann, H.J., 2010. Alternative reproductive tactics and life history phenotypes. In: Kappeler, P. (Ed.), Animal Behavior: Evolution and Mechanisms. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 537-586.

Authors
Maruska, K. P.
Affiliations
Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Maruska, Karen P.
Venue
General and Comparative Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
207
Pages
2-12
ISSN
0016-6480 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056443253
Cited by
82
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General and Comparative Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Louisiana State University
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
dominance hierarchy, social status, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, reproductive behavior, gene expression plasticity, reproductive success, mating systems, parental care, teleosts
MeSH terms
Animals, Male, Reproduction, Social Dominance, Social Environment, Cichlids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review