Cited by 16Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal testing and alternativesAmphibian and Reptile Biology

Effects of transportation, transport medium and re-housing on Xenopus laevis (Daudin)

Open access
Holmes, Andrew M., Emmans, Christopher J., Coleman, Robert, Smith, Tessa E., Hosie, Charlotte A.·2018·General and Comparative Endocrinology

Abstract

Understanding the immediate and longer-term effects of transportation and re-housing in a laboratory species is crucial in order to refine the transfer process, enable the optimal introduction of new animals to a novel environment and to provide a sufficient acclimatisation period before usage. Whilst consideration of animal welfare in most model vertebrate species has received attention, little quantitative evidence exists for the optimal care of the common laboratory amphibian Xenopus laevis. Techniques for the non-invasive welfare assessment of amphibians are also limited and here a non-invasive physiological assay was developed to investigate the impacts of transportation, transport medium and re-housing on X. laevis. First the impacts of transportation and transport medium (water, damp sponge or damp sphagnum moss) were investigated. Transportation caused an increase in water-borne corticosterone regardless of transport medium. Frogs transported in damp sphagnum moss also had a greater decrease in body mass in comparison to frogs not transported, suggesting that this is the least suitable transport medium for X. laevis. Next the prolonged impacts of transportation and re-housing were investigated. Frogs were transported between research facilities with different housing protocols. Samples were collected prior to and immediately following transportation, as well as 1 day, 7 days and 35 days after re-housing. Water-borne corticosterone increased following transportation an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygcen.2018.03.015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Physiological acclimatisation after a stressful event, such as transport, but before the experiment begins allows stabilisation of physiological responses of the animal.

    “Physiological acclimatisation after a stressful event, such as transport (e.g., between supplier, animal facility, operating theatre, and laboratory), but before the experiment begins allows stabilisation of physiological responses of the animal [137,138].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmes, A. M., Emmans, C. J., Coleman, R., Smith, T. E., & Hosie, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Chester (GB)
Corresponding author
Hosie, Charlotte A.
Venue
General and Comparative Endocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
266
Pages
21-28
ISSN
0016-6480 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790588329
Cited by
16
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • General and Comparative Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
NC3Rs (NC/K000497/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
Xenopus laevis, animal transport, transport media, corticosterone, stress response, weight loss, acclimatization
MeSH terms
Acclimatization, Animals, Animal Welfare, Corticosterone, Female, Housing, Animal, Male, Transportation, Water, Xenopus laevis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review