Cited by 61Genetic Syndromes and ImprintingGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

C15orf2 and a novel noncoding transcript from the Prader–Willi/Angelman syndrome region show monoallelic expression in fetal brain

Open access
Buiting, Karin, Nazlican, Hülya, Galetzka, Danuta, Wawrzik, Michaela, Groβ, Stephanie, Horsthemke, Bernhard·2007·Genomics

Abstract

The Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) region contains several genes transcribed from the paternal chromosome only. We have previously identified a testis-specific gene, C15orf2, which maps between NDN and SNURF-SNRPN and is expressed from both alleles. Here we report on two novel genes (prader-willi region non-protein-coding RNA 1 and 2) located between NDN and C15orf2. By database search we found five partially duplicated copies, of which only one of each appears to be active. PWRN2 is expressed only in testis and is biallelic. PWRN1 is biallelically expressed in testis and kidney, but monoallelically in fetal brain. Methylation analysis of a CpG island 15 kb upstream of exon 1 showed absence of methylation in spermatozoa, but methylated and unmethylated alleles in fetal brain. Reinvestigation of C15orf2 revealed that this gene is also expressed in fetal brain and that expression in this tissue is monoallelic. We conclude that PWRN1 and C15orf2 may play a role in PWS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.12.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three HHMCs are observed in NPAP1, which might be associated with the Prader-Willi syndrome, involving behavioral problems and a high pain threshold.

    “three HHMCs are observed in NPAP1, which might be associated with the Prader-Willi syndrome, involving behavioral problems and a high pain threshold182.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 61

Authors
Buiting, K., Nazlican, H., Galetzka, D., Wawrzik, M., Groβ, S., & Horsthemke, B.
Affiliations
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
89
Issue
5
Pages
588-595
ISSN
0888-7543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009920091
Cited by
61
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
Prader-Willi syndrome, Angelman syndrome, monoallelic expression, non-coding RNA, paternal chromosomes, NDN, CpG island methylation, fetal brain, testis-specific gene expression, gene duplication, imprinting
MeSH terms
Alleles, Brain, Fetus, Humans, Male, Prader-Willi Syndrome, Proteins, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression, Cytokines, Angelman Syndrome, Alternative Splicing, Genomic Imprinting, DNA Methylation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review