Cited by 106Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Characterizing the mouse ES cell transcriptome with Illumina sequencing

Open access
Rosenkranz, Ruben, Borodina, Tatiana, Lehrach, Hans, Himmelbauer, Heinz·2008·Genomics

Abstract

Large datasets generated by Illumina sequencing are ideally suited to transcriptome characterization. We generated 3,052,501 27-mer reads from F1 mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell cDNA. Using the ELAND alignment tool, 74.5% of reads matched sequenced mouse resources, <1% were contaminants, and 3.7% failed quality control. Of the reads, 21.6% did not match mouse sequences using ELAND, but most of them were successfully aligned with mouse mRNAs using MegaBLAST. We conclude that most of the reads in the dataset are derived from mouse transcripts. A total of 14,434 mouse RefSeq genes were represented by at least 1 read. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.7 between Illumina sequencing and Illumina array expression data suggested similar results for both technologies. A weak 3' bias of reads was found. Reads from genes with low expression had lower GC content than the corresponding RefSeq genes, indicating a GC bias. Biases were confirmed with further Illumina read datasets generated with cDNA from mouse brain and from mutagen-treated F1 ES cells. We calculated relative expression values, because transcript length and read number were correlated. In the absence of signal saturation or background noise, we believe that short-read sequencing technologies will have a major impact on gene expression studies in the near future.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ygeno.2008.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Illumina transcriptome or genome sequencing was mainly limited to organisms with reference genomes available.

    “In contrast, Illumina transcriptome or genome sequencing was mainly limited to organisms with reference genomes available [14,51-53].”

    From De novo assembly and characterization of root transcriptome using Illumina paired-end sequencing and development of cSSR markers in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas) (2010) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Mapping of 27-mer Illumina ES cell reads to sequence databases section describes an Illumina transcriptome analysis that aligned mouse reads to RefSeq and the mouse genome. This provides an example involving an available reference genome, but the paper does not establish that Illumina transcriptome or genome sequencing was mainly limited to such organisms. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 106

Authors
Rosenkranz, R., Borodina, T., Lehrach, H., & Himmelbauer, H.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Himmelbauer, Heinz
Venue
Genomics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
92
Issue
4
Pages
187-194
ISSN
0888-7543 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076592980
Cited by
106
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
mouse embryonic stem cells, transcriptome, short-read sequencing, cDNA sequencing, read mapping, eland, MegaBLAST, GC content bias, gene expression, microarray comparison, brain transcriptome
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Fibroblasts, Gene Expression Regulation, Mutagens, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Sequence Alignment, DNA, Complementary, Coculture Techniques, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic, Mice, Embryonic Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review