Identification of vaccine human papillomavirus genotypes in squamous intraepithelial lesions (CIN2–3)
Abstract
Objective To identify the prevalence of human papillomavirus vaccine genotypes and non-vaccine genotypes implicated in the appearance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2-3). Methods Prospective study of 519 women with abnormal cytology. All the women underwent a second Papanicolaou test, cervicovaginal sampling for type-specific HPV detection and colposcopy, and women with abnormal colposcopy results were referred to biopsy. Pearson's chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. Results HPV was detected in 340 patients (65.5%), and in 125 (24%) more than one HPV genotype was present. We selected 206 patients with CIN2 or CIN3 confirmed by biopsy. In 88 (42.7%) of these patients, HPV types 16 and 18 were detected, but only 58 (28.2%) without co-infection by other high-risk or probable high-risk HPV types. In 115 (55.8%) women diagnosed with CIN2 or CIN3 high-risk or probable high-risk HPV types other than 16 or 18 were found. High-risk and/or probable high-risk HPV genotypes not included in the vaccine were isolated in this study more frequently than 16 or 18, and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.047). Of the 206 women diagnosed with CIN2 or CIN3, 19 tested negative for HPV and 14 tested positive for low-risk HPV types. Conclusion Only 28.2% of women with CIN2 or CIN3 confirmed by biopsy were infected exclusively by HPV type 16 or 18, a finding that places in doubt the degree of protection afforded by HPV vaccination.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sexual activity is higher in younger women.
“Since sexual activity is higher in younger women, multiple genotype infection is higher at this age [30–32].”
From HPV Genotypes distribution in Indian women with and without cervical carcinoma: Implication for HPV vaccination program in Odisha, Eastern India (2017) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Senapati, R., Nayak, B., Kar, S. K., & Dwibedi, B. (2017) · BMC Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1186/s12879-016-2136-4 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
- Authors
- González-Bosquet, E., Esteva, C., Muñoz-Almagro, C., Ferrer, P., Pérez, M., & Lailla, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona (ES)
- ORCID
- Esteva, Cristina
- Venue
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-12
- ISSN
- 0090-8258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2129224786
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gynecologic Oncology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- human papillomavirus, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN2/3, HPV16, HPV 18, HPV co-infection, high-risk HPV, vaccine protection, cervical cancer prevention, low-risk HPV
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Genotype, Humans, Prospective Studies, Vaginal Smears, Conization, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Human papillomavirus 18, Human papillomavirus 16, Papillomavirus Vaccines, Papanicolaou Test
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review