Social cognition under stress: Differential effects of stress-induced cortisol elevations in healthy young men and women
Abstract
Humans as social beings often have to perform complex social cognitive tasks while under stress (e.g., during a social conflict). Previous research has established that the brain regions responsible for social cognitive tasks are target regions for stress hormones. However, little experimental research has been done testing the acute effects of stress on social cognition. Here, we investigated whether stress exposure and the ensuing glucocorticoid (i.e., cortisol) elevations affect social cognition. Thirty-two men and 32 women were exposed to either a psychosocial stress or a non-stressful control test before assessing their social cognition using the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) and the Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition (MASC). Results showed differential effects of stress-induced cortisol responses among men and women for the MASC, but not the RMET. Among men, high cortisol responders displayed elevated MASC scores compared with low cortisol responders. Moreover, for stressed men a positive association between the magnitude of the cortisol responses to the stressor and MASC scores emerged. Among women, enhanced MASC scores were found for low cortisol responders relative to high cortisol responders and non-stressed controls. A strong negative association between cortisol reactivity and MASC scores was found among women. These results imply sex specific effects of glucocorticoids on social cognition and partially support the idea of sex differences in b…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 52 · Cited by 176
- Authors
- Smeets, T., Dziobek, I., & Wolf, O. T.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Smeets, Tom
- Venue
- Hormones and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 507-513
- ISSN
- 0018-506X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130534263
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- social cognition, stress, cortisol, glucocorticoids, sex differences, psychosocial stress, cortisol response, Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, fight-or-flight response
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cognition, Female, Glucocorticoids, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Models, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Saliva, Sex Characteristics, Social Perception, Stress, Psychological, Video Recording
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review