Cited by 86Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports Performance and TrainingStress Responses and Cortisol

Changes in salivary testosterone concentrations and subsequent voluntary squat performance following the presentation of short video clips

Cook, Christian J., Crewther, Blair T.·2012·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that visual images can produce rapid changes in testosterone concentrations. We explored the acute effects of video clips on salivary testosterone and cortisol concentrations and subsequent voluntary squat performance in highly trained male athletes (n=12). Saliva samples were collected on 6 occasions immediately before and 15 min after watching a brief video clip (approximately 4 min in duration) on a computer screen. The watching of a sad, erotic, aggressive, training motivational, humorous or a neutral control clip was randomised. Subjects then performed a squat workout aimed at producing a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) lift. Significant (P<0.001) relative (%) increases in testosterone concentrations were noted with watching the erotic, humorous, aggressive and training videos (versus control and sad), with testosterone decreasing significantly (versus control) after the sad clip. The aggressive video also produced an elevated cortisol response (% change) and more so than the control and humorous videos (P<0.001). A significant (P<0.003) improvement in 3RM performance was noted after the erotic, aggressive and training clips (versus control). A strong within-individual correlation (mean r=0.85) was also noted between the relative changes in testosterone and the 3RM squats across all video sessions (P<0.001). In conclusion, different video clips were associated with different changes in salivary free hormone concentrations and the relative changes in testosterone closely mapped 3RM squat performance in a group of highly trained males. Thus, speculatively, using short video presentations in the pre-workout environment offers an opportunity for understanding the outcomes of hormonal change, athlete behaviour and subsequent voluntary performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.09.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 55 · Cited by 86

Authors
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T.
Affiliations
  • United Kingdom Sport (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Crewther, Blair T.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153102651
Cited by
86
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/H009744/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
salivary testosterone, salivary cortisol, video presentation, visual stimuli, squat performance, acute hormonal response, aggression, emotional arousal, male athletes
MeSH terms
Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Saliva, Testosterone, Video Recording, Weight Lifting, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Athletic Performance, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review