Sniff and mimic–Intranasal oxytocin increases facial mimicry in a sample of men
Open accessAbstract
The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) has many potential social benefits. For example, intranasal administration of OT appears to trigger caregiving behavior and to improve the recognition of emotional facial expressions. But the mechanism for these effects is not yet clear. Recent findings relating OT to action imitation and to the visual processing of the eye region of faces point to mimicry as a mechanism through which OT improves processing of emotional expression. To test the hypothesis that increased levels of OT in the brain enhance facial mimicry, 60 healthy male participants were administered, in a double-blind between-subjects design, 24 international units (IUs) of OT or placebo (PLA) through nasal spray. Facial mimicry and emotion judgments were recorded in response to movie clips depicting changing facial expressions. As expected, facial mimicry was increased in the OT group, but effects were strongest for angry infant faces. These findings provide further evidence for the importance of OT in social cognitive skills, and suggest that facial mimicry mediates the effects of OT on improved emotion recognition.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Korb and colleagues used facial EMG to show that facial mimicry increased under oxytocin, especially in response to angry infant faces.
“For example, Korb et al. (2016), used facial EMG to show that facial mimicry increased during OXT, particularly in response to angry infant faces.”
From Oxytocin increases attention to the eyes and selectively enhances self-reported affective empathy for fear (2017) · cites this paper as Korb et al. (2016)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 117 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Korb, S., Malsert, J., Strathearn, L., Vuilleumier, P., & Niedenthal, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of Iowa (US)
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Corresponding author
- Korb, Sebastian
- Venue
- Hormones and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 84
- Pages
- 64-74
- ISSN
- 0018-506X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2410868979
- Semantic Scholar
- bb534e04c39f807cdc38ca9acc29e26fe7f374df
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 117
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Hormones and Behavior (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
- Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (BCS-1251101, PBGEP1-139870)
- National Science Foundation (ANR-10-ORAR-010-01)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Keywords
- oxytocin, facial mimicry, action imitation, emotion recognition, facial expressions, social cognition, intranasal administration, emotion judgment
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Emotions, Facial Expression, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Oxytocin, Social Perception, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review