Cited by 55Stress Responses and CortisolBirth, Development, and HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Maternal programming of sex-specific responses to predator odor stress in adult rats

St-Cyr, Sophie, Abuaish, Sameera, Sivanathan, Shathveekan, McGowan, Patrick O.·2017·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Prenatal stress mediated through the mother can lead to long-term adaptations in stress-related phenotypes in offspring. This study tested the long-lasting effect of prenatal exposure to predator odor, an ethologically relevant and psychogenic stressor, in the second half of pregnancy. As adults, the offspring of predator odor-exposed mothers showed increased anxiety-like behaviors in commonly used laboratory tasks assessing novelty-induced anxiety, increased defensive behavior in males and increased ACTH stress reactivity in females in response to predator odor. Female offspring from predator odor-exposed dams showed increased transcript abundance of glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) on the day of birth and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) in adulthood in the amygdala. The increase in FKBP5 expression was associated with decreased DNA methylation in Fkbp5 intron V. These results indicate a sex-specific response to maternal programming by prenatal predator odor exposure and a potential epigenetic mechanism linking these responses with modifications of the stress axis in females. These results are in accordance with the mismatch hypothesis stating that an animal's response to cues within its life history reflects environmental conditions anticipated during important developmental periods and should be adaptive when these conditions are concurring.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.06.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 55

Authors
St-Cyr, S., Abuaish, S., Sivanathan, S., & McGowan, P. O.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
McGowan, Patrick O.
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
94
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2633749078
Cited by
55
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (402525-2012-RGPIN)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
maternal programming, prenatal stress, predator odor, psychogenic stress, anxiety-like behavior, sex differences, glucocorticoid receptor, FKBP5, DNA methylation, amygdala, mismatch hypothesis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
MeSH terms
Tacrolimus Binding Protein 5, Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Defense Mechanisms, Escape Reaction, Female, Male, Mothers, Odorants, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Maternal Exposure, Rats, Long-Evans, Food Chain, Tacrolimus Binding Proteins, Rats, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review