Maternal programming of sex-specific responses to predator odor stress in adult rats
Abstract
Prenatal stress mediated through the mother can lead to long-term adaptations in stress-related phenotypes in offspring. This study tested the long-lasting effect of prenatal exposure to predator odor, an ethologically relevant and psychogenic stressor, in the second half of pregnancy. As adults, the offspring of predator odor-exposed mothers showed increased anxiety-like behaviors in commonly used laboratory tasks assessing novelty-induced anxiety, increased defensive behavior in males and increased ACTH stress reactivity in females in response to predator odor. Female offspring from predator odor-exposed dams showed increased transcript abundance of glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) on the day of birth and FK506 binding protein 5 (FKBP5) in adulthood in the amygdala. The increase in FKBP5 expression was associated with decreased DNA methylation in Fkbp5 intron V. These results indicate a sex-specific response to maternal programming by prenatal predator odor exposure and a potential epigenetic mechanism linking these responses with modifications of the stress axis in females. These results are in accordance with the mismatch hypothesis stating that an animal's response to cues within its life history reflects environmental conditions anticipated during important developmental periods and should be adaptive when these conditions are concurring.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overexpression of FKBP5 as a result of decreased FKBP5 methylation in the amygdala is associated with the anxiety phenotype in adult rats.
“Overexpression of FKBP5 as a result of decreased FKBP5 methylation in the amygdala is associated with the anxiety phenotype in adult rats (St-Cyr et al., 2017).”
From The Epigenetics of Anxiety Pathophysiology: A DNA Methylation and Histone Modification Focused Review (2023) · cites this paper as St-Cyr et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- St-Cyr, S., Abuaish, S., Sivanathan, S., & McGowan, P. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- McGowan, Patrick O.
- Venue
- Hormones and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0018-506X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2633749078
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (402525-2012-RGPIN)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
- Keywords
- maternal programming, prenatal stress, predator odor, psychogenic stress, anxiety-like behavior, sex differences, glucocorticoid receptor, FKBP5, DNA methylation, amygdala, mismatch hypothesis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
- MeSH terms
- Tacrolimus Binding Protein 5, Amygdala, Animals, Anxiety, Defense Mechanisms, Escape Reaction, Female, Male, Mothers, Odorants, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Receptors, Glucocorticoid, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Maternal Exposure, Rats, Long-Evans, Food Chain, Tacrolimus Binding Proteins, Rats, Cellular Reprogramming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review