Modeling host–pathway dynamics at the genome scale with machine learning
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Pathway engineering offers a promising avenue for sustainable chemical production. The design of efficient production systems requires understanding complex host-pathway interactions that shape the metabolic phenotype. While genome-scale metabolic models are widespread tools for studying static host-pathway interactions, it remains a challenge to predict dynamic effects such as metabolite accumulation or enzyme overexpression during the course of fermentation. Here, we propose a novel strategy to integrate kinetic pathway models with genome-scale metabolic models of the production host. Our method enables the simulation of the local nonlinear dynamics of pathway enzymes and metabolites, informed by the global metabolic state of the host as predicted by Flux Balance Analysis (FBA). To reduce computational costs, we make extensive use of surrogate machine learning models to replace FBA calculations, achieving simulation speed-ups of at least two orders of magnitude. Through case studies on two production pathways in Escherichia coli , we demonstrate the consistency of our simulations and the ability to predict metabolite dynamics under genetic perturbations and various carbon sources. We showcase the utility of our method for screening dynamic control circuits through large-scale parameter sampling and mixed-integer optimization. Our work links together genome-scale and kinetic models into a comprehensive framework for computational strain design.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Constraining the metabolic genotype–phenotype relationship using a phylogeny of in silico methods
Lewis, N. E., Nagarajan, H., & Palsson, B. O. (2012) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2737 · Cited by 779 · see citing works
Deep learning-based kcat prediction enables improved enzyme-constrained model reconstruction
Li, F., Yuan, L., Lu, H., Li, G., Chen, Y., Engqvist, M. K. M., Kerkhoven, E. J., & Nielsen, J. (2022) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-022-00798-z · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Khodayari, A., & Maranas, C. D. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13806 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
The BRENDA enzyme information system–From a database to an expert system
Schomburg, I., Jeske, L., Ulbrich, M., Placzek, S., Chang, A., & Schomburg, D. (2017) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.04.020 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Labhsetwar, P., Cole, J. A., Roberts, E., Price, N. D., & Luthey-Schulten, Z. A. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1222569110 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Merzbacher, C., Mac Aodha, O., & Oyarzún, D. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Oyarzún, Diego A.
- Venue
- Metabolic Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-09
- Volume
- 91
- Pages
- 480-491
- ISSN
- 1096-7176 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411373118
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Metabolic Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- UK Research and Innovation (EP/S02431X/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Keywords
- genome-scale metabolic models, flux balance analysis, metabolite dynamics, Escherichia coli, heterologous pathway expression, transcriptional regulatory networks, carbon source optimization, strain design
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Escherichia coli, Models, Biological, Genome, Bacterial, Metabolic Networks and Pathways, Metabolic Engineering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review