Methods to generate tissue-derived constructs for regenerative medicine applications
Abstract
The shortage of donor organs for transplantation remains a continued problem for patients with irreversible end-stage organ failure. Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine aims to develop therapies to provide viable solutions for these patients. Use of decellularized tissue scaffolds has emerged as an attractive approach to generate tissue constructs that mimic native tissue architecture and vascular networks. The process of decellularization which involves the removal of resident cellular components from donor tissues has been successfully translated to the clinic for applications in patients. However, transplantation of bioengineered solid organs using this approach remains a challenge as the process requires repopulating target cells to achieve functioning organs. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the methods used to achieve decellularization, the types of decellularizing agents, and the potential cell sources that could be used to achieve tissue function. Understanding the mechanism of action of the decellularizing agent and the processing methods will provide the optimal results for applications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Trypsin may impact ECM mechanics.
“Initially used in decellularization for its efficacy in disrupting tissue ultrastructure and enhancing the penetration of other agents, trypsin may nevertheless impact ECM mechanics.”
From Bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering: A review of decellularized extracellular matrix applications and innovations (2025) · cites this paper as [45]
Trypsin is disruptive to ECM components, especially collagen and elastin, potentially affecting mechanical strength, particularly with higher concentrations or longer exposure times.
“Trypsin is disruptive to ECM components, especially collagen and elastin, potentially affecting mechanical strength, particularly with higher concentrations or longer exposure times [[158], [159], [160], [161]].”
From Liver tissue engineering using decellularized scaffolds: Current progress, challenges, and opportunities (2024) · cites this paper as [160]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 99 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Paulo Zambon, J., Atala, A., & Yoo, J. J.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yoo, James J.
- Venue
- Methods
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-01
- Volume
- 171
- Pages
- 3-10
- ISSN
- 1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2979867571
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Keywords
- decellularization, tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, cell repopulation, organ shortage, cell sources, vascular system
- MeSH terms
- Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Tissue Donors, Tissue Engineering, Regenerative Medicine, Tissue Scaffolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review