Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Radiomics for precision medicine: Current challenges, future prospects, and the proposal of a new framework

Open access
Ibrahim, A., Primakov, S., Beuque, M., Woodruff, H.C., Halilaj, I., Wu, G., Refaee, T., Granzier, R., Widaatalla, Y., Hustinx, R., Mottaghy, F.M., Lambin, P.·2021·Methods

Abstract

The advancement of artificial intelligence concurrent with the development of medical imaging techniques provided a unique opportunity to turn medical imaging from mostly qualitative, to further quantitative and mineable data that can be explored for the development of clinical decision support systems (cDSS). Radiomics, a method for the high throughput extraction of hand-crafted features from medical images, and deep learning -the data driven modeling techniques based on the principles of simplified brain neuron interactions, are the most researched quantitative imaging techniques. Many studies reported on the potential of such techniques in the context of cDSS. Such techniques could be highly appealing due to the reuse of existing data, automation of clinical workflows, minimal invasiveness, three-dimensional volumetric characterization, and the promise of high accuracy and reproducibility of results and cost-effectiveness. Nevertheless, there are several challenges that quantitative imaging techniques face, and need to be addressed before the translation to clinical use. These challenges include, but are not limited to, the explainability of the models, the reproducibility of the quantitative imaging features, and their sensitivity to variations in image acquisition and reconstruction parameters. In this narrative review, we report on the status of quantitative medical image analysis using radiomics and deep learning, the challenges the field is facing, propose a framework for robust radiomics analysis, and discuss future prospects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.05.022

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Ibrahim, A., Primakov, S., Beuque, M., Woodruff, H. C., Halilaj, I., Wu, G., Refaee, T., Granzier, R., Widaatalla, Y., Hustinx, R., Mottaghy, F. M., & Lambin, P.
Venue
Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
188
Pages
20-29
ISSN
1046-2023 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3032938107
Cited by
265
References
69
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiomics for precision medicine: Current challenges, future prospects, and the proposal of a new framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.05.022
The paper
Ibrahim, A., Primakov, S., Beuque, M., Woodruff, H. C., Halilaj, I., Wu, G., Refaee, T., Granzier, R., Widaatalla, Y., Hustinx, R., Mottaghy, F. M., & Lambin, P. (2021). Radiomics for precision medicine: Current challenges, future prospects, and the proposal of a new framework. Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.05.022

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.