Interrelationships of chromalveolates within a broadly sampled tree of photosynthetic protists
Abstract
The Chromalveolata "supergroup" is a massive assemblage of single-celled and multicellular protists such as ciliates and kelps that remains to be substantiated in molecular trees. Recent multigene analyses place chromalveolates into two major clades, the SAR (Stramenopiles, Alveolata, and Rhizaria) and the Cryptophyta+Haptophyta. Here we determined 69 new sequences from different chromalveolates to study the interrelationships of its constituent phyla. We included in our trees, the novel groups Telonemia and Katablepharidophyta that have previously been described as chromalvoleate allies. The best phylogenetic resolution resulted from a 6-protein (actin, alpha-tubulin, beta-tubulin, cytosolic HSP70, BIP HSP70, HSP90) and a 5-protein (lacking HSP90) alignment that validated the SAR and cryptophyte+haptophyte clades with the inclusion of telonemids in the former and katablepharids in the latter. We assessed the Plastidophila hypothesis that is based on EF2 data and suggest this grouping may be explained by horizontal gene transfers involving the EF2 gene rather than indicating host relationships.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Microalgal species being investigated as potential biofuel crops originate from groups whose ancestral relationships are significantly broader than the most diverse land plants, providing a wealth of genetic diversity.
“The microalgal species being investigated as potential biofuel crops originate from groups whose ancestral relationships are significantly broader than the most diverse land plants, providing a wealth of genetic diversity [20,21].”
From Biofuels from algae: Challenges and potential (2010) · cites this paper as [21]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 59 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Reeb, V. C., Peglar, M. T., Yoon, H. S., Bai, J. R., Wu, M., Shiu, P., Grafenberg, J. L., Reyes-Prieto, A., Rümmele, S. E., & Gross, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences (US)
- Venue
- Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 202-211
- ISSN
- 1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2009123051
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Keywords
- photosynthetic protists, phylogenetic relationships, cryptophytes, haptophytes, actin, alpha-tubulin, beta-tubulin, HSP70, HSP90, horizontal gene transfer, plastid evolution, ciliates, kelp
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Ribosomal, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular, Cryptophyta, DNA, Algal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review