Cited by 54Fish Biology and Ecology StudiesEvolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Phylogenetic relationships, subdivision, and biogeography of the cyprinid tribe Labeonini (sensu Rainboth, 1991) (Teleostei: Cypriniformes), with comments on the implications of lips and associated structures in the labeonin classification

Yang, Lei, Mayden, Richard L.·2010·Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution

Abstract

The Labeonini (sensu Rainboth, 1991) is a tribe of the subfamily Cyprininae, the largest subfamily of Cypriniformes. With around 400 species in 34 genera, this tribe is widely distributed in the freshwaters of tropical Africa and Asia. Most species are adapted to fast-flowing streams and rivers, and exhibit unique morphological modifications associated with their lips and other structures around the mouth. The monophyly of this tribe has been tested and generally accepted in previous morphological and molecular studies. The major objectives of this study were to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships within the tribe Labeonini, test its monophyly and explore the taxonomic subdivisions, intrarelationships and biogeography of the group. The value of the morphological characters associated with the lips and other associated structures in the taxonomic classification of labeonins was also discussed. Nucleotide sequences (3867 bp) of four unlinked nuclear loci were obtained from 51 species in 18 Labeonini genera from throughout the range of the tribe. Maximum parsimony, partitioned maximum likelihood and partitioned Bayesian analyses were used for phylogenetic inference from combined and separate gene data sets. Based on our results, the monophyly of Labeonini was well supported. Two major clades could be recovered within the tribe. Three subclades could further be recognized from the first clade. These clades/subclades are not consistent with groupings of any of previous work…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.027

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, L., & Mayden, R. L.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Mayden, Richard L.
Venue
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
254-265
ISSN
1055-7903 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049702549
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
Cyprininae, Cypriniformes, phylogenetic relationships, monophyly, biogeography, lip morphology, taxonomic classification, convergent evolution, nuclear loci, freshwater fish
MeSH terms
Animals, Bayes Theorem, Cell Nucleus, Cypriniformes, Geography, Lip, Phylogeny, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review