Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yang and Nagarajaiah combined blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification to locate and quantify structural damage.
“Yang and Nagarajaiah [129] combined blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification to locate and quantify structural damage.”
From Review on the new development of vibration-based damage identification for civil engineering structures: 2010–2019 (2021) · cites this paper as [129]
Cites
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Some researchers used the model updating method [17,18] to address this problem, by comparing the undamaged (reference) and candidate (test) model (physical or modal) matrices [3].”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hou, R., & Xia, Y. (2021) · Journal of Sound and Vibration · doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Zhang, C. D., & Xu, Y. L. (2016) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.1785 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
L <sub>1</sub> regularization approach to structural damage detection using frequency data
Zhou, X.-Q., Xia, Y., & Weng, S. (2015) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/1475921715604386 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Sparse Bayesian learning for structural damage detection using expectation–maximization technique
Hou, R., Xia, Y., Zhou, X., & Huang, Y. (2019) · Structural Control and Health Monitoring · doi:10.1002/stc.2343 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, Y., & Nagarajaiah, S.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nagarajaiah, Satish
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061599165
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 20.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Keywords
- structural damage detection, damage localization, damage severity estimation, sparse representation, compressed sensing, overcomplete dictionary, l1-norm minimization, damage classification, multiple damage detection, noise robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review