Cited by 101Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques

Structural damage identification via a combination of blind feature extraction and sparse representation classification

Yang, Yongchao, Nagarajaiah, Satish·2014·Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.09.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Yang, Y., & Nagarajaiah, S.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Corresponding author
Nagarajaiah, Satish
Venue
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
1-23
ISSN
0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061599165
Cited by
101
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3
FWCI
20.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Keywords
structural damage detection, damage localization, damage severity estimation, sparse representation, compressed sensing, overcomplete dictionary, l1-norm minimization, damage classification, multiple damage detection, noise robustness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review