Cited by 540Structural Health Monitoring TechniquesControl Systems and IdentificationBladed Disk Vibration Dynamics

Dealing with uncertainty in model updating for damage assessment: a review

Open access
Simoen, Ellen, De Roeck, Guido, Lombaert, Geert·2015·Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.11.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simoen, E., De Roeck, G., & Lombaert, G.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Lombaert, Geert
Venue
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-05
Volume
56-57
Pages
123-149
ISSN
0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044990306
Cited by
540
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 1
FWCI
37.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) (G.0738.11)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Bladed Disk Vibration Dynamics
Keywords
model updating, structural damage assessment, uncertainty quantification, inverse problems, ill-posed problems, ill-conditioning, Bayesian model updating, finite element model updating, modal data, probabilistic methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review