A history of cepstrum analysis and its application to mechanical problems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital signal processing methods-Fourier transforms, cepstral techniques, and principal component analysis-brought reproducibility and comparability to bioacoustics and made it possible to test hypotheses about vocal learning, hormonal effects, and neurophysiological control with new rigor.
“These methods brought reproducibility and comparability to a field that had long relied on description, making it possible to test hypotheses about vocal learning, hormonal effects, and neurophysiological control with new rigor”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Randall 2017
Cites
An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series
Cooley, J. W., & Tukey, J. W. (1965) · Mathematics of Computation · doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-1965-0178586-1 · Cited by 13,154 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies Ahead
Zhang, B., Cui, H., Nguyen, V., & Whitty, M. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25071989 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
“Fourier transforms broke calls into their frequency components (Davis 1986), ceps-tral techniques revealed subtle modulation patterns beyond human hearing (Randall 2017), and principal component analysis distilled massive datasets into biologically meaningful axes of variation (Budaev 2010).”
- Authors
- Randall, R. B.
- Affiliations
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Randall, Robert B.
- ORCID
- Randall, Robert B.
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-12
- Volume
- 97
- Pages
- 3-19
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2563365999
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 22.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Electricité de France
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
- Keywords
- cepstrum analysis, complex cepstrum, gear fault diagnosis, modal analysis, speech analysis, fundamental frequency estimation, MIMO, blind source separation, exponential window, modal damping, non-stationary signals, transfer function poles and zeros
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
