The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 183 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications
Open accessAbstract
Monitoring structural damage is extremely important for sustaining and preserving the service life of civil structures. While successful monitoring provides resolute and staunch information on the health, serviceability, integrity and safety of structures; maintaining continuous performance of a structure depends highly on monitoring the occurrence, formation and propagation of damage. Damage may accumulate on structures due to different environmental and human-induced factors. Numerous monitoring and detection approaches have been developed to provide practical means for early warning against structural damage or any type of anomaly. Considerable effort has been put into vibration-based methods, which utilize the vibration response of the monitored structure to assess its condition and identify structural damage. Meanwhile, with emerging computing power and sensing technology in the last decade, Machine Learning (ML) and especially Deep Learning (DL) algorithms have become more feasible and extensively used in vibration-based structural damage detection with elegant performance and often with rigorous accuracy. While there have been multiple review studies published on vibration-based structural damage detection, there has not been a study where the transition from traditional methods to ML and DL methods are described and discussed. This paper aims to fulfill this gap by presenting the highlights of the traditional methods and provide a comprehensive review of the most recent applications of ML and DL algorithms utilized for vibration-based structural damage detection in civil structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
(2016) · Cited by 11,679
Ensemble methods in machine learning
Dietterich, T. G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45014-9_1 · Cited by 8,408
A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance
Jardine, A. K. S., Lin, D., & Banjevic, D. (2006) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.09.012 · Cited by 4,816
Deep Learning: Methods and Applications
Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing · doi:10.1561/2000000039 · Cited by 3,480
A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications
Liu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, N., Liu, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 · Cited by 3,239
Los Alamos National Lab., N. (. S., Doebling, S., USDOE, W., Farrar, C., Prime, M., & Shevitz, D. (1996) · doi:10.2172/249299 · Cited by 2,899 · cited 2×
“On another note, [67–70,72] focus predominantly on traditional vibration-based SDD methods without highlighting ML and DL methods while this paper covers work utilizing ML and DL based methods.”
BackgroundDeep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 · Cited by 2,894
Cited by
Baduge, S. K., Thilakarathna, S., Perera, J. S., Arashpour, M., Sharafi, P., Teodosio, B., Shringi, A., & Mendis, P. (2022) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104440 · Cited by 1,007
“More detailed review of application of vibration based damage detection from traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning has been discussed by Avci et al. [103].”
Machine Learning for Structural Engineering: A State-of-the-Art Review
Thai, H.-T. (2022) · Structures · doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.003 · Cited by 748
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Mohtasham Moein, M., Saradar, A., Rahmati, K., Ghasemzadeh Mousavinejad, S. H., Bristow, J., Aramali, V., & Karakouzian, M. (2023) · Journal of Building Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105444 · Cited by 391
Progress and Opportunities for Machine Learning in Materials and Processes of Additive Manufacturing
Ng, W. L., Goh, G. L., Goh, G. D., Ten, J. S. J., & Yeong, W. Y. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202310006 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J.
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 147
- Pages
- 107077
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016123475
- Cited by
- 1,442
- References
- 183
- FWCI
- 83.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077
- The paper
- Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., & Inman, D. J. (2021). A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: From traditional methods to Machine Learning and Deep Learning applications. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107077
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.