The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This work is interested in digital twins, and the development of a simplified framework for them, in the context of dynamical systems. Digital twin is an ingenious concept that helps on organizing different areas of expertise aiming at supporting engineering decisions related to a specific asset; it articulates computational models, sensors, learning, real time analysis, diagnosis, prognosis, and so on. In this framework, and to leverage its capacity, we explore the integration of physics-based models with machine learning. A digital twin is constructed for a damaged structure, where a discrete physics-based computational model is employed to investigate several damage scenarios. A machine learning classifier, that serves as the digital twin, is trained with data taken from a stochastic computational model. This strategy allows the use of an interpretable model (physics-based) to build a fast digital twin (machine learning) that will be connected to the physical twin to support real time engineering decisions. Different classifiers (quadratic discriminant, support vector machines, etc) are tested, and different model parameters (number of sensors, level of noise, damage intensity, uncertainty, operational parameters, etc) are considered to construct datasets for the training. The accuracy of the digital twin depends on the scenario analyzed. Through the chosen application, we are able to emphasize each step of a digital twin construction, including the possibility of integrating physics-based models with machine learning. The different scenarios explored yield conclusions that might be helpful for a large range of applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · Cited by 46,844
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 · Cited by 20,384
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
John Lu, Z. Q. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00646_6.x · Cited by 12,390
The finite element method. Linear static and dynamic finite element analysis
Zimmermann, T. (1987) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/0045-7825(87)90013-2 · Cited by 5,080
The Finite Element Method: Linear Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis
Hughes, T. J. R. (1987) · Cited by 4,852
The fourth industrial revolution
Schwab, K. (n.d.) · Cited by 2,997
Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring
Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019) · Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050 · Cited by 2,894
An introduction to structural health monitoring
Farrar, C. R., & Worden, K. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2006.1928 · Cited by 2,628
Cited by
Tao, F., Xiao, B., Qi, Q., Cheng, J., & Ji, P. (2022) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.06.015 · Cited by 1,255
Digital Twins: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Challenges, Trends and Future Prospects
Mihai, S., Yaqoob, M., Hung, D. V., Davis, W., Towakel, P., Raza, M., Karamanoglu, M., Barn, B., Shetve, D., Prasad, R. V., et al. (2022) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3208773 · Cited by 1,049
Malekloo, A., Ozer, E., AlHamaydeh, M., & Girolami, M. (2022) · Structural Health Monitoring · doi:10.1177/14759217211036880 · Cited by 607
Badihi, H., Zhang, Y., Jiang, B., Pillay, P., & Rakheja, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2022.3171691 · Cited by 319
Literature review of digital twin technologies for civil infrastructure
Liu, C., Zhang, P., & Xu, X. (2023) · Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience · doi:10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100050 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritto, T. G., & Rochinha, F. A.
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 107614
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3031421697
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 28.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107614
- The paper
- Ritto, T. G., & Rochinha, F. A. (2021). Digital twin, physics-based model, and machine learning applied to damage detection in structures. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107614
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.