Parameter identification of fractional-order time delay system based on Legendre wavelet
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Legendre wavelet based method [30] is not applicable to block-oriented nonlinear models.
“This method is not applicable to block-oriented nonlinear models.”
From Application of Fractional Calculus for Parameter Estimation of Nonlinear Wiener Systems With Time Delay (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kothari, K. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3367441 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“A Legendre wavelet based method was developed for the parameter estimation of linear and nonlinear systems in [30].”
Method
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Wang, C., Ding, L., Wang, Z., & Liang, S.
- Affiliations
- Changchun University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Chunyang
- Venue
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 163
- Pages
- 108141
- ISSN
- 0888-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3174563584
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Fractional Differential Equations Solutions
- Keywords
- fractional-order systems, time-delay systems, parameter estimation, Legendre wavelets, operational matrices, fractional order estimation, noise reduction, wavelet decomposition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
