Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Estimating frequency response functions by using transient responses of systems to simple excitations

Cong, Shuai, Hu, Sau-Lon James, Li, Hua-Jun·2023·Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
DOI 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110866
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110866

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Schoukens, 2018, Nonparametric data-driven modeling of linear systems: Estimating the frequency response and impulse response function, IEEE Control Syst. Mag., 38, 49, 10.1109/MCS.2018.2830080 · DOI
  2. Maeda, 2022, Empirical transfer function estimation with differential filtering and its application to fine positioning control of galvano scanner, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron.
  3. Allemang, 2022, Frequency response function estimation techniques and the corresponding coherence functions: A review and update, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 162, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108100 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108100
  4. G.Y. Rocklin, A comparison of H1, H2 and Hv frequency response functions, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Modal Analysis Conference, 1985, pp. 272–278.
  5. Pintelon, 2010, Estimation of nonparametric noise and FRF models for multivariable systems-Part I: Theory, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 24, 573, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.08.009 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Pintelon, 2011, Improved (non-) parametric identification of dynamic systems excited by periodic signals, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 25, 2683, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.03.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.03.003
  7. Schoukens, 2013, Bounding the polynomial approximation errors of frequency response functions, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 62, 1346, 10.1109/TIM.2012.2232451 · doi:10.1109/tim.2012.2232451
  8. Voorhoeve, 2018, Non-parametric identification of multivariable systems: A local rational modeling approach with application to a vibration isolation benchmark, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 105, 129, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.044 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.044
  9. Peumans, 2019, Accurate estimation of the non-parametric FRF of lightly-damped mechanical systems using arbitrary excitations, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 130, 545, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.023 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.05.023
  10. Csurcsia, 2020, User-friendly nonlinear nonparametric estimation framework for vibro-acoustic industrial measurements with multiple inputs, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 145, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106926 · doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106926
  11. M.H. Richardson, D.L. Formenti, Parameter estimation from frequency response measurements using rational fraction polynomials, in: Proceedings of the 1st International Modal Analysis Conference, Vol. 1, 1982, pp. 167–186.
  12. Van Der Auweraer, 1987, Multiple input orthogonal polynomial parameter estimation, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 1, 259, 10.1016/0888-3270(87)90103-8 · doi:10.1016/0888-3270(87)90103-8
  13. Pintelon, 1994, Parametric identification of transfer functions in the frequency domain-a survey, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 39, 2245, 10.1109/9.333769 · doi:10.1109/9.333769
  14. P. Guillaume, P. Verboven, S. Vanlanduit, H. Van Der Auweraer, B. Peeters, A poly-reference implementation of the least-squares complex frequency-domain estimator, in: Proceedings of 21st International Modal Analysis Conference, Vol. 21, 2003, pp. 183–192.
  15. D. Formenti, M. Richardson, Parameter estimation from frequency response measurements using rational fraction polynomials (twenty years of progress), in: Proceedings of 20th International Modal Analysis Conference, 2002, pp. 373–382.
  16. Spitznogle, 1970, Representation and analysis of time-limited signals using a complex exponential algorithm, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 47, 1150, 10.1121/1.1912020 · doi:10.1121/1.1912020
  17. Brown, 1979, Parameter estimation techniques for modal analysis, SAE Trans., 828
  18. Juang, 1985, An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction, J. Guid. Control Dyn., 8, 620, 10.2514/3.20031 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hu, 2013, Signal decomposition and reconstruction using complex exponential models, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 40, 421, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2013.06.037 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hu, 2016, Pole-residue method for numerical dynamic analysis, J. Eng. Mech., 142
  21. Cao, 2022, Frequency/Laplace domain methods for computing transient responses of fractional oscillators, Nonlinear Dynam., 108, 1509, 10.1007/s11071-022-07256-2 · doi:10.1007/s11071-022-07256-2
  22. Birpoutsoukis, 2018, Efficient multidimensional regularization for Volterra series estimation, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 104, 896, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.10.007 · DOI
  23. Cong, 2022, FRF-based pole-zero method for finite element model updating, Mech. Syst. Signal Process., 177, 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109206 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Cong, S., Hu, S.-L. J., & Li, H.-J.
Venue
Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
205
Pages
110866
ISSN
0888-3270
DOI
10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110866
Cited by
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (52088102)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating frequency response functions by using transient responses of systems to simple excitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110866
The paper
Cong, S., Hu, S.-L. J., & Li, H.-J. (2023). Estimating frequency response functions by using transient responses of systems to simple excitations. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110866

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.