Cited by 115Lysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchRetinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy research

AAV2-mediated ocular gene therapy for infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Open access
Griffey, Megan, Macauley, Shannon L., Ogilvie, Judith M., Sands, Mark S.·2005·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (INCL) is a neurodegenerative disorder caused by mutations in the gene encoding the lysosomal enzyme palmitoyl protein thioesterase-1 (PPT1). The earliest clinical sign in INCL is blindness, followed by seizures, cognitive deficits, and early death. Little is known about the progression of the visual deficits in INCL. Here we characterize the progressive retinal dysfunction and examine the efficacy of AAV2-mediated ocular gene therapy in the murine model of INCL. Significant decreases in both mixed rod/cone and pure cone electroretinographic amplitudes were observed at as early as 2 months of age. Intravitreal injection of AAV2-PPT1 increased enzyme levels in the eye to greater than normal levels. The increased PPT1 activity correlated with improvements in the histological abnormalities as well as both mixed rod/cone and pure cone functions. We also demonstrated that palmitoyl protein thioesterase-1 activity was detected in the brain following intravitreal injection. The brain activity is likely due to anterograde axonal transport along the optic tracts. Interestingly, the degree of neurodegeneration throughout the visual pathways of the brain was greatly reduced in AAV-treated INCL mice. Therefore, intravitreal AAV-mediated gene therapy has direct benefits to the eye and to distal sites in the brain along the visual pathways.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.04.018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 115

Authors
Griffey, M., Macauley, S. L., Ogilvie, J. M., & Sands, M. S.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
413-421
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047162457
Cited by
115
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (EY 02687, P30EY002687)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC 04665, P30DC004665)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-57586, R01DK057586)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS43205)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, PPT1, retinal dysfunction, electroretinogram, intravitreal injection, lysosomal storage disease, neurodegeneration, visual pathway, mouse model
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Axons, Brain, Disease Models, Animal, Electroretinography, Genetic Vectors, Immunohistochemistry, Lysosomes, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mutation, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Neurons, Retina, Thiolester Hydrolases, Time Factors, Genetic Therapy, Polymerase Chain Reaction, DNA, Complementary, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review