Cited by 200Virus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Efficient Neuronal Gene Transfer with AAV8 Leads to Neurotoxic Levels of Tau or Green Fluorescent Proteins

Open access
Klein, Ronald L., Dayton, Robert D., Leidenheimer, Nancy J., Jansen, Karen, Golde, Todd E., Zweig, Richard M.·2006·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 8 appears to be the strongest of the natural serotypes reported to date for gene transfer in liver and muscle. In this study, we evaluated AAV8 in the brain by several methods, including biophotonic imaging of green fluorescent protein (GFP). In the adult rat hippocampus, levels of GFP expressed were clearly greater with AAV8 than with AAV2 or AAV5 by Western blot and biophotonic imaging and slightly but significantly greater than AAV1 by Western blot. In the substantia nigra, the GFP expression conferred by AAV8 was toxic to dopamine neurons, although toxicity could be avoided with dose titration. At the low dose at which there was no GFP toxicity from the GFP vector, another AAV8 vector for a disease-related (P301L) form of the microtubule-associated protein tau caused a 78% loss of dopamine neurons and significant amphetamine-stimulated rotational behavior. The AAV8 tau vector-induced cell loss was greater than that from AAV2 or AAV5 tau vectors, demonstrating that the increased gene transfer was functional. While the toxicity observed with GFP expression warrants great caution, the efficient AAV8 is promising for animal models of neurodegenerative diseases and potentially as well for gene therapy of brain diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2005.10.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 200

Authors
Klein, R. L., Dayton, R. D., Leidenheimer, N. J., Jansen, K., Golde, T. E., & Zweig, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Ronald L.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
517-527
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987114379
Cited by
200
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS048450)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
AAV8, adeno-associated virus serotypes, gene delivery to the brain, P301L tau, tauopathy, AAV2, AAV5, AAV1, hippocampus, substantia nigra, neurodegenerative disease models, gene therapy, dose titration, rotational behavior
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Disease Models, Animal, Genetic Vectors, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Neurons, Serotyping, Substantia Nigra, tau Proteins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Gene Transfer Techniques, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review