Cited by 270CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringRetinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy research

CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing as a Therapeutic Approach for Leber Congenital Amaurosis 10

Open access
Ruan, Guo-Xiang, Barry, Elizabeth, Yu, Dan, Lukason, Michael, Cheng, Seng H., Scaria, Abraham·2017·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

As the most common subtype of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), LCA10 is a severe retinal dystrophy caused by mutations in the CEP290 gene. The most frequent mutation found in patients with LCA10 is a deep intronic mutation in CEP290 that generates a cryptic splice donor site. The large size of the CEP290 gene prevents its use in adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene augmentation therapy. Here, we show that targeted genomic deletion using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 system represents a promising therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with LCA10 bearing the CEP290 splice mutation. We generated a cellular model of LCA10 by introducing the CEP290 splice mutation into 293FT cells and we showed that guide RNA pairs coupled with SpCas9 were highly efficient at removing the intronic splice mutation and restoring the expression of wild-type CEP290. In addition, we demonstrated that a dual AAV system could effectively delete an intronic fragment of the Cep290 gene in the mouse retina. To minimize the immune response to prolonged expression of SpCas9, we developed a self-limiting CRISPR/Cas9 system that minimizes the duration of SpCas9 expression. These results support further studies to determine the therapeutic potential of CRISPR/Cas9-based strategies for the treatment of patients with LCA10.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.12.006

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SpCas9 reversed the 3849+10kbC>T splicing defects exclusively with sgRNA pairs that deleted the intronic region containing the mutation; individual sgRNA targeting the mutation (+1, +5, +18) did not repair the splicing defect.

    “We found that, consistently with the most commonly used genome editing strategies27,51, SpCas9 reversed the splicing defects exclusively with sgRNA pairs which deleted the intronic region containing the mutation (Supplementary Fig. 11a, b); in contrast to AsCas12a, SpCas9 combined with an individual sgRNA targeting the mutation (+1, +5, +18) did not repair the splicing defect (Supplementary Fig. 1”
  • This trial is designed to treat photoreceptor degeneration in LCA10 caused by CEP290 mutations using a targeted AAV5-spCas9.

    “This trial is designed to treat photoreceptor degeneration in LCA10 caused by CEP290 mutations using a targeted AAV5-spCas9 [100].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 270

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Garanto, A. ∙ Chung, D.C. ∙ Duijkers, L. ... In vitro and in vivo rescue of aberrant splicing in CEP290-associated LCA by antisense oligonucleotide delivery Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016; 25:2552-2563 PubMed Google Scholar

Authors
Ruan, G.-X., Barry, E., Yu, D., Lukason, M., Cheng, S. H., & Scaria, A.
Corresponding author
Ruan, Guo-Xiang
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
331-341
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2575178850
Cited by
270
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 21
FWCI
13.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi Genzyme
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
CEP290, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing, cryptic splice donor site, retinal dystrophy, SpCas9, guide RNA
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, RNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems, Animals, Antigens, Neoplasm, Cytoskeletal Proteins, Female, Introns, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Retina, RNA, Messenger, Gene Expression, Sequence Deletion, Alternative Splicing, Gene Targeting, Cell Cycle Proteins, Gene Order, Mice, Targeted Gene Repair, Genetic Loci, Leber Congenital Amaurosis, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review