The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Function of Novel Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptors with Human Variable Regions Is Affected by Hinge and Transmembrane Domains
Open accessAbstract
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have caused remissions of B cell malignancies, but problems including cytokine-mediated toxicity and short persistence of CAR T cells in vivo might limit the effectiveness of anti-CD19 CAR T cells. Anti-CD19 CARs that have been tested clinically had single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) derived from murine antibodies. We have designed and constructed novel anti-CD19 CARs containing a scFv with fully human variable regions. T cells expressing these CARs specifically recognized CD19 + target cells and carried out functions including degranulation, cytokine release, and proliferation. We compared CARs with CD28 costimulatory moieties along with hinge and transmembrane domains from either the human CD28 molecule or the human CD8α molecule. Compared with T cells expressing CARs with CD28 hinge and transmembrane domains, T cells expressing CARs with CD8α hinge and transmembrane domains produced lower levels of cytokines and exhibited lower levels of activation-induced cell death (AICD). Importantly, CARs with hinge and transmembrane regions from either CD8α or CD28 had similar abilities to eliminate established tumors in mice. In anti-CD19 CARs with CD28 costimulatory moieties, lower levels of inflammatory cytokine production and AICD are potential clinical advantages of CD8α hinge and transmembrane domains over CD28 hinge and transmembrane domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Berman, H. M. (2000) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · Cited by 40,196
Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions
Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Förster, R., Lipp, M., & Lanzavecchia, A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44385 · Cited by 5,846 · cited 1×
“There was also not a statistically significant difference between T cells expressing Hu19-CD828Z and Hu19-28Z in the percentage of naïve, effector memory, or central memory T cells as defined by CD45RA and CCR7 markers (not shown).(35) There was a borderline difference in CD69 expression (P=0.”
BackgroundChimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Sustained Remissions in Leukemia
Maude, S. L., Frey, N., Shaw, P. A., Aplenc, R., Barrett, D. M., Bunin, N. J., Chew, A., Gonzalez, V. E., Zheng, Z., Lacey, S. F., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1407222 · Cited by 5,413
Molecular and cellular insights into T cell exhaustion
Wherry, E. J., & Kurachi, M. (2015) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri3862 · Cited by 4,652
Wherry, E. J. (2011) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.2035 · Cited by 4,062 · cited 1×
“These markers are associated with T-cell exhaustion.(46)”
Chimeric antigen receptor–modified T cells in chronic lymphoid leukemia
Porter, D. L., Levine, B. L., Kalos, M., Bagg, A., & June, C. H. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103849 · Cited by 3,565
Lee, D. W., Kochenderfer, J. N., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Cui, Y. K., Delbrook, C., Feldman, S. A., Fry, T. J., Orentas, R., Sabatino, M., Shah, N. N., et al. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61403-3 · Cited by 2,898
Self-citationEfficacy and Toxicity Management of 19-28z CAR T Cell Therapy in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Davila, M. L., Riviere, I., Wang, X., Bartido, S., Park, J., Curran, K., Chung, S. S., Stefanski, J., Borquez-Ojeda, O., Olszewska, M., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3008226 · Cited by 2,476
CD19 CAR–T cells of defined CD4+:CD8+ composition in adult B cell ALL patients
Turtle, C. J., Hanafi, L.-A., Berger, C., Gooley, T. A., Cherian, S., Hudecek, M., Sommermeyer, D., Melville, K., Pender, B., Budiarto, T. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci85309 · Cited by 2,112
Brentjens, R. J., Davila, M. L., Riviere, I., Park, J., Wang, X., Cowell, L. G., Bartido, S., Stefanski, J., Taylor, C., Olszewska, M., et al. (2013) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3005930 · Cited by 2,063
Cited by
CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies
Sterner, R. C., & Sterner, R. M. (2021) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/s41408-021-00459-7 · Cited by 2,926
Recent advances and discoveries in the mechanisms and functions of CAR T cells
Larson, R. C., & Maus, M. V. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-00323-z · Cited by 852
Brudno, J. N., Maric, I., Hartman, S. D., Rose, J. J., Wang, M., Lam, N., Stetler-Stevenson, M., Salem, D., Yuan, C., Pavletic, S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2018.77.8084 · Cited by 781
Self-citationClinical lessons learned from the first leg of the CAR T cell journey
Majzner, R. G., & Mackall, C. L. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0564-6 · Cited by 636
Enhancing CAR T cell persistence through ICOS and 4-1BB costimulation
Guedan, S., Posey, A. D., Shaw, C., Wing, A., Da, T., Patel, P. R., McGettigan, S. E., Casado-Medrano, V., Kawalekar, O. U., Uribe-Herranz, M., et al. (2018) · JCI Insight · doi:10.1172/jci.insight.96976 · Cited by 580
Metadata
- Authors
- Alabanza, L., Pegues, M., Geldres, C., Shi, V., Wiltzius, J. J. W., Sievers, S. A., Yang, S., & Kochenderfer, J. N.
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2452-2465
- ISSN
- 1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2739972212
- Cited by
- 351
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Function of Novel Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptors with Human Variable Regions Is Affected by Hinge and Transmembrane Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.07.013
- The paper
- Alabanza, L., Pegues, M., Geldres, C., Shi, V., Wiltzius, J. J. W., Sievers, S. A., Yang, S., & Kochenderfer, J. N. (2017). Function of Novel Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptors with Human Variable Regions Is Affected by Hinge and Transmembrane Domains. Molecular Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.07.013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.