A Nanostructured Lipid Carrier for Delivery of a Replicating Viral RNA Provides Single, Low-Dose Protection against Zika
Open accessAbstract
Since the first demonstration of in vivo gene expression from an injected RNA molecule almost two decades ago, 1 the field of RNA-based therapeutics is now taking significant strides, with many cancer and infectious disease targets entering clinical trials. 2 Critical to this success has been advances in the knowledge and application of delivery formulations. Currently, various lipid nanoparticle (LNP) platforms are at the forefront, 3 but the encapsulation approach underpinning LNP formulations offsets the synthetic and rapid-response nature of RNA vaccines. 4 Second, limited stability of LNP formulated RNA precludes stockpiling for pandemic readiness. 5 Here, we show the development of a two-vialed approach wherein the delivery formulation, a highly stable nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC), can be manufactured and stockpiled separate from the target RNA, which is admixed prior to administration. Furthermore, specific physicochemical modifications to the NLC modulate immune responses, either enhancing or diminishing neutralizing antibody responses. We have combined this approach with a replicating viral RNA (rvRNA) encoding Zika virus (ZIKV) antigens and demonstrated a single dose as low as 10 ng can completely protect mice against a lethal ZIKV challenge, representing what might be the most potent approach to date of any Zika vaccine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lipid nanoparticle-mRNA formulations are being explored for Zika virus vaccines.
“Lipid nanoparticle–mRNA formulations are further being explored for Zika virus vaccines38,190,192–194.”
From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [38]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 161
- Authors
- Erasmus, J. H., Khandhar, A. P., Guderian, J., Granger, B., Archer, J., Archer, M., Gage, E., Fuerte-Stone, J., Larson, E., Lin, S., Kramer, R., Coler, R. N., Fox, C. B., Stinchcomb, D. T., Reed, S. G., & Van Hoeven, N.
- Affiliations
- Infectious Disease Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Erasmus, Jesse H.
- Khandhar, Amit P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2507-2522
- ISSN
- 1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6171036
- OpenAlex
- W2887139475
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1F32AI136371)
- Washington Research Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Keywords
- nanostructured lipid carriers, Zika vaccine, RNA therapeutics, RNA delivery, neutralizing antibodies, immunomodulation, vaccine stockpiling, mouse challenge protection
- MeSH terms
- Zika Virus Infection, Zika Virus, Animals, Antigens, Viral, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Lipids, RNA, Viral, Virus Replication, Drug Delivery Systems, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review