Cited by 11Virus-based gene therapy researchGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

2020 ASGCT Annual Meeting Abstracts

Open access
Sripriya R. Kumar, Timothy F. Miles, Xinhong Chen, Brown, David, Tatyana Dobreva, Qin Huang, Xiaozhe Ding, Yicheng Luo +5 more·2020·Molecular Therapy

Abstract

Friedreich’s Ataxia (FRDA) is a genetic disease affecting multiple organ systems, in which an intronic triplet repeat expansion (GAA) suppresses expression of frataxin (FXN). This mitochondrial protein is involved in iron-sulfur clustering, and non-regenerating tissues become especially vulnerable to oxidative stress and cell damage. In FRDA patients, neuronal damage in the CNS and PNS impairs motor coordination, manifesting as progressive gait and limb ataxia. In addition, oxidative stress in the heart leads to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in early adulthood, which is often lethal. Naturally occurring AAV serotypes are widely used in research settings and clinical trials to deliver genetic cargo throughout the body when administered systemically. However, broad transduction of current systemic vectors (e.g. AAV9) can have deleterious off-target effects[1], underscoring the need for vectors that limit efficient transduction to specific disease targets. In this study, we aimed to develop precision AAV-mediated FXN gene replacement therapy to replace physiologic levels of FXN in the deep cerebellar nuclei, dorsal root ganglia, and the heart in two mouse models of FRDA, while minimizing transduction of organ systems and cell types that are not major contributors to the disease process, including the liver. To this aim, we used a dual-engineering approach to optimize both the delivery system and therapeutic cargo for targeted replacement of physiologic levels of FXN. Three constru…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.04.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, S. R., Miles, T. F., Chen, X., Brown, D., Dobreva, T., Huang, Q., Ding, X., Luo, Y., Einarsson, P. H., Greenbaum, A., Jang, M. J., Deverman, B. E., & Gradinaru, V.
Venue
Molecular Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1-592
ISSN
1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288083446
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
Friedreich's ataxia, frataxin, AAV gene therapy, targeted gene replacement, deep cerebellar nuclei, dorsal root ganglia, oxidative stress, iron-sulfur proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review