Behavioral, neurochemical, and neuroimmune changes associated with social buffering and stress contagion
Open accessAbstract
Social buffering can provide protective effects on stress responses and their subsequent negative health outcomes. Although social buffering is beneficial for the recipient, it can also have anxiogenic effects on the provider of the social buffering – a phenomena referred to as stress contagion. Social buffering and stress contagion usually occur together, but they have traditionally been studied independently, thus limiting our understanding of this dyadic social interaction. In the present study, we examined the effects of preventative social buffering and stress contagion in socially monogamous prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). We tested the hypothesis that this dynamic social interaction is associated with coordinated alterations in behaviors, neurochemical activation, and neuroimmune responses. To do so, adult male prairie voles were stressed via an acute immobilization restraint tube (IMO) either alone (Alone) or with their previously pair-bonded female partner (Partner) in the cage for 1 h. In contrast, females were placed in a cage containing either an empty IMO tube (Empty) or one that contained their pair-bonded male (Partner). Anxiety-like behavior was tested on the elevated plus maze (EPM) following the 60-mins test and brain sections were processed for neurochemical/neuroimmune marker labeling for all subjects. Our data indicate that females in the Partner group were in contact with and sniffed the IMO tube more, showed fewer anxiety-like behaviors, and had a higher level of oxytocin expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) compared to the Empty group females. Males in the Partner group had lower levels of anxiety-like behavior during the EPM test, greater activation of corticotropin-releasing hormone expressing neurons in the PVN, lower activation of serotonin neurons in the dorsal raphe, and lower levels of microgliosis in the nucleus accumbens. Taken together, these data suggest brain region- and neurochemical-specific alterations as well as neuroinflammatory changes that may be involved in the regulation of social buffering and stress contagion behaviors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oxytocin is a critical modulator of fear and anxiety and in the vast majority of cases elicits anxiolytic effects.
“Oxytocin, on its side, has been widely demonstrated to be a critical modulator of fear and anxiety (Jurek and Neumann, 2018), which in the vast majority of cases, elicits anxiolytic effects (see Jang et al. (2021); Chun et al. (2022)).”
From Evidence for the existence of facilitatory interactions between the dopamine D2 receptor and the oxytocin receptor in the amygdala of the rat relevance for anxiolytic actions (2023) · cites this paper as Chun et al. (2022)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 122 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Chun, E. K., Donovan, M., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z.
- Affiliations
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Zuoxin
- Venue
- Neurobiology of Stress
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-01
- Volume
- 16
- Pages
- 100427
- ISSN
- 2352-2895 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8749234
- OpenAlex
- W4205965500
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Neurobiology of Stress (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1449440)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-108527, R21-111998, R01-109450)
- Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- National Institutes of Health (T32 MH093311)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- social buffering, stress contagion, Microtus ochrogaster, oxytocin, corticotropin-releasing factor, serotonin, dorsal raphe nucleus, microglial activation, nucleus accumbens, paraventricular nucleus, anxiety-like behavior, restraint stress, pair bonding, social monogamy, neuroinflammation, neurochemistry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review