Cited by 132Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyMormonism, Religion, and HistoryHealth disparities and outcomes

Lifestyle and reduced mortality among active California Mormons, 1980–2004

Enstrom, James E., Breslow, Lester·2008·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective The objective is to measure the relationship of several healthy characteristics of the Mormon lifestyle to mortality.Method We examined 9815 religiously active California Mormon adults followed for mortality during 1980-2004 and 15,832 representative U.S. white adults enrolled in the 1987 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and followed for mortality during 1988-1997. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated relative to U.S. whites defined to have a SMR of 1.00.Results Active California Mormons practice a healthy lifestyle advocated by their religion, which emphasizes a strong family life, education and abstention from tobacco and alcohol. Unusually low SMRs occurred among married never smokers who attended church weekly and had at least 12 years of education. For those aged 25-99 years at entry, the SMR for all causes of death was 0.45 (0.42-0.48) for males and 0.55 (0.51-0.59) for females. For those aged 25-64 years at entry, the SMR for all causes of death was 0.36 (0.32-0.41) for males and 0.46 (0.40-0.53) for females. Life expectancy from age 25 was 84 years for males and 86 years for females. These SMRs were largely replicated among similarly defined persons of all religions within the NHIS cohort.Conclusions Several healthy characteristics of the Mormon lifestyle are associated with substantially reduced death rates and increased life expectancy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level).

    “Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level) [548–566], whereas three (5%) reported shorter longevity [567–569].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 11 · Cited by 132

Authors
Enstrom, J. E., & Breslow, L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
133-136
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985624416
Cited by
132
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 45 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Cancer Society
  • Wallace Genetic Foundation
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Mormonism, Religion, and History
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
Mormonism, religious lifestyle, mortality, life expectancy, church attendance, smoking abstinence, alcohol abstinence, family life, standardized mortality ratio, all-cause mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Life Expectancy, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Confidence Intervals, Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review